Answer: 1954
Explanation:
When the court case of Brown vs. board of education occurred
technically this is asking your own personal opinion but i will give an asnwer based on my knowledge of it:
"In my personal opinion, it is an unfair clause. If a criminal were to go to court for a crime and walk free he would never be able to be accused of that crime in the future. Detectives are always making new leads in cases and if they were to find any new eveidence, no matter how incriminating it was they would not be able to arrest him a second time.
Answer:
Thank you and please rate me as brainliest as it will help me to level up
Answer:
True, the Chief Justice delivered the verdict of a 5-4 majority, stating that the defendant's interrogation violated his Fifth Amendment Right..
Explanation:
Activities that give rise to <u> strict liability </u>are maintaining a dangerous animal, engaging in an abnormally dangerous activity, and manufacturing or distributing a defective product
Explanation:
Strict liability can be defined as the doctrine that makes a person liable even if the person did not act with fault or negligence
<u>This Liability imposes legal responsibility for injuries and damages even if the defendant who was found liable is without fault</u>
<u></u>
Activities that give rise to <u> strict liability </u>are maintaining a dangerous animal, engaging in an abnormally dangerous activity, and manufacturing or distributing a defective product.
<u>Selling Alcohol to a minor,having sex with a minor are few example of Strict Liability</u>
