Answer:
The correct answer is B. Correct! Since Ace is not in control of the actions of Kosier (an independent contractor), Ace would generally not be responsible for Kosier's torts.
Explanation:
An independent contractor is a person who is hired to do a specific job. It is said that she is her own boss because she controls how and where the work is done.
These people have greater freedom and only undertake to perform the specific function they agreed with the person owning a company. For example, the independent contractor agrees that he will serve clients at a 9 a.m. store. at 1 p.m. or that he will go to the meetings and prepare a report on the subject assigned to him. Outside these specific functions, the independent contractor controls how he manages his time.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option D: Both the foreseeable doctrine and the restatement doctrine.
Explanation:
On the one hand, the <em>foreseeable doctrine</em> dictates that there is a limit in the liability of party for those acts that he has done and that carry a risk of foreseeable harm. Therefore that this point of view establishes that a reasonable person would be able to understand and so to know when a certain action would bring certain damages to another party.
On the oher hand, the <em>restatement doctrine</em> establishes that there are a set of treatises on legal subjects that primarily are looking for to inform judges and lawyers about general principles of common law. And therefore that those treatises will help both the judge and the lawyers at the time of the trial when the person has to go to court.
Answer:
Scarcity refers to the basic economic problem, the gap between limited that is, scarce resources and theoretically limitless wants. This situation requires people to make decisions about how to allocate resources efficiently, in order to satisfy basic needs and as many additional wants as possible.
HOPE THIS HELPED!!!!!!!!!!XDDDDD
Answer:
$22,500
Explanation:
The computation of the total cost saving is shown below:
= Cost saving × number of zippers needed
= $0.25 × 90,000 zippers
= $22,500
We simply multiply the cost saving with the needed zipper so that accurate amount can come
The cost saving would be
= Outside supplier price - transfer price
= $3.50 - $3.25
= $0.25
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer: C. The court concluded that Microsoft violated the Sherman Act
Explanation: The case between United States v. Microsoft Corporation which took place at the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit during the period February 26–27, 2001 and was finally decided June 28, 2001.
It was decided by the District Court that Microsoft violated the Sharma Antitrust Act of 1890.
