1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kvv77 [185]
3 years ago
8

At equilibrium, the concentrations in this system were found to be [N2]=[O2]=0.200 M and [NO]=0.600 M. N2(g)+O2(g)↽−−⇀2NO(g) If

more NO is added, bringing its concentration to 0.900 M, what will the final concentration of NO be after equilibrium is re‑established?
Chemistry
1 answer:
cestrela7 [59]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

0.84M

Explanation:

Hello,

At first, the equilibrium constant should be computed because the whole situation is at the same temperature so it is suitable for the new condition, thus:

K_{eq}=\frac{[NO]^2_{eq}}{[N_2]_{eq}[O_2]_{eq}} \\K_{eq}=\frac{0.6^2}{0.2*0.2}\\ K_{eq}=9

Now, the new equilibrium condition, taking into account the change x, becomes:

9=\frac{[NO]^2_{eq}}{[N_2]_{eq}[O_2]_{eq}}\\9=\frac{[0.9+2x]^2}{[0.2-x][0.2-x]}

Nevertheless, since the addition of NO implies that the equilibrium is leftward shifted, we should change the equilibrium constant the other way around:

\frac{1}{9} =\frac{[N_2]_{eq}[O_2]_{eq}}{[NO]^2_{eq}}\\\frac{1}{9} =\frac{[0.2+x][0.2+x]}{[0.9-2x]^2}

Thus, we arrange the equation as:

\frac{1}{9} (0.9-2x)^2=(0.2+x)^2\\0.09-0.4x+4x^2=0.04+0.4x+x^2\\3x^2-0.8x+0.05=0\\x_1=0.06

Finally, the new concentration is:

[NO]_{eq}=0.9-0.06=0.84M

Best regards.

You might be interested in
If 0.5 moles of Aluminum react, how many grams of Aluminum Oxide are produced?
Marysya12 [62]

Answer:

210438+28+5+8+2+2+8+30+5+8+6+8+2+5+3+82+8+9+2+8+8+5+5+5+6+9+2+56+5+6+5+-3+8+8+58+5+6+8+5+8+5+35+6+3+8+5+3+68+6+8+6+88+8+!?=8+5+55+5+5+5+5+5+5+5+5+5+2+58+0+80=0=0=00=

3 0
3 years ago
Please help it’s short please!!!!!!! Thank youuuu!!!
Fofino [41]

Answer:

first at start Aarau so I just way we Z

6 0
2 years ago
A certain first-order reaction has a half-life of 25.2 s at 20°C. What is the value of the rate constant k at 60°C if the activa
DochEvi [55]

Answer:

t

(

2

)

1/2

=

85.25 s

Notice how you're given the half-life (for one temperature), a second temperature, and the activation energy. The key to doing this problem is recognizing that:

the half-life for a first-order reaction is related to its rate constant.

the rate constant changes at different temperatures.

Go here for a derivation of the half-life of a first-order reaction. You should find that:

t

1/2

=

ln

2

k

Therefore, if we label each rate constant, we have:

k

1

=

ln

2

t

(

1

)

1/2

k

2

=

ln

2

t

(

2

)

1/2

Recall that the activation energy can be found in the Arrhenius equation:

k

=

A

e

−

E

a

/

R

T

where:

A

is the frequency factor, i.e. it is proportional to the number of collisions occurring over time.

E

a

is the activation energy in

kJ/mol

.

R

=

0.008314472 kJ/mol

⋅

K

is the universal gas constant. Make sure you get the units correct on this!

T

is the temperature in

K

(not

∘

C

).

Now, we can derive the Arrhenius equation in its two-point form. Given:

k

2

=

A

e

−

E

a

/

R

T

2

k

1

=

A

e

−

E

a

/

R

T

1

we can divide these:

k

2

k

1

=

e

−

E

a

/

R

T

2

e

−

E

a

/

R

T

1

Take the

ln

of both sides:

ln

(

k

2

k

1

)

=

ln

(

e

−

E

a

/

R

T

2

e

−

E

a

/

R

T

1

)

=

ln

(

e

−

E

a

/

R

T

2

)

−

ln

(

e

−

E

a

/

R

T

1

)

=

−

E

a

R

T

2

−

(

−

E

a

R

T

1

)

=

−

E

a

R

[

1

T

2

−

1

T

1

]

Now if we plug in the rate constants in terms of the half-lives, we have:

ln

⎛

⎜

⎝

ln

2

/

t

(

2

)

1/2

ln

2

/

t

(

1

)

1/2

⎞

⎟

⎠

=

−

E

a

R

[

1

T

2

−

1

T

1

]

This gives us a new expression relating the half-lives to the temperature:

⇒

ln

⎛

⎜

⎝

t

(

1

)

1/2

t

(

2

)

1/2

⎞

⎟

⎠

=

−

E

a

R

[

1

T

2

−

1

T

1

]

Now, we can solve for the new half-life,

t

(

2

)

1/2

, at the new temperature,

40

∘

C

. First, convert the temperatures to

K

:

T

1

=

25

+

273.15

=

298.15 K

T

2

=

40

+

273.15

=

313.15 K

Finally, plug in and solve. We should recall that

ln

(

a

b

)

=

−

ln

(

b

a

)

, so the negative cancels out if we flip the

ln

argument.

⇒

ln

⎛

⎜

⎝

t

(

2

)

1/2

t

(

1

)

1/2

⎞

⎟

⎠

=

E

a

R

[

1

T

2

−

1

T

1

]

⇒

ln

⎛

⎜

⎝

t

(

2

)

1/2

400 s

⎞

⎟

⎠

=

80 kJ/mol

0.008314472 kJ/mol

⋅

K

[

1

313.15 K

−

1

298.15 K

]

=

(

9621.78 K

)

(

−

1.607

×

10

−

4

K

−

1

)

=

−

1.546

Now, exponentiate both sides to get:

t

(

2

)

1/2

400 s

=

e

−

1.546

⇒

t

(

2

)

1/2

=

(

400 s

)

(

e

−

1.546

)

=

85.25 s

This should make sense, physically. From the Arrhenius equation, the higher

T

2

is, the more negative the

[

1

T

2

−

1

T

1

]

term, which means the larger the right hand side of the equation is.

The larger the right hand side gets, the larger

k

2

is, relative to

k

1

(i.e. if

ln

(

k

2

k

1

)

is very large,

k

2

>>

k

1

). Therefore, higher temperatures means larger rate constants.

Furthermore, the rate constant is proportional to the rate of reaction

r

(

t

)

in the rate law. Therefore...

The higher the rate constant, the faster the reaction, and thus the shorter its half-life should be.

Explanation:

Sorry just go here https://socratic.org/questions/588d14f211ef6b4912374c92#370588

3 0
2 years ago
Identify the missing coefficient in the following equation:<br><br>3<br><br>2<br><br>1<br><br>0
Pie

Answer:

2

Explanation:

In balancing nuclear reactions the mass number and atomic numbers are usually conserved. This implies that from the given equation, the sum of the number of the subscript on the right hand side must be equal to that on the left hand side. This also applies to the superscript:

   For the mass numbers(superscript):

   235 + 1 = 1 + 139 + 95

       236 = 235

This is not balanced

  For the atomic number:

  92 + 0 = 0 + 53 + 39

      92 = 92

This is balanced.

We simply inspect to see how to balance the mass number.

By putting a coefficient of 2 behind the neutron atom, the equation becomes balanced.

7 0
3 years ago
Help! This is due tomorrow and my teacher didn't explain this topic very well so I'm totally lost!
nydimaria [60]

Answer:

sorry I'm a dumb small brain

Explanation:

my genes

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A dam is used to retain water. Retaining water can also lead to flooding. Which most likely would be a new societal issue result
    6·2 answers
  • The vapor pressure of liquid chloroform, CHCl3, is 400.0 torr at 24.1 °C and 100.0 torr at –6.3 °C. What is DeltaH of vaporizati
    12·1 answer
  • What is the molarity of a solution prepared by dissolving 10.0g of kno3 in 250 ml of solution
    10·1 answer
  • A measurement of the amount of solute that is dissolved in a given quantity of solvent; usually expressed as mol/L.
    13·1 answer
  • Calculate the Kelvin temperatures of the water and record your answers in the data table.
    5·1 answer
  • What substance is acting as the Brønsted-Lowry base in the forward reaction below? H2O + HCI ----&gt; H3O+ CI-
    9·1 answer
  • which feature of the ocean floor includes its deeper parts ? A.Trench B.estuary C.mid-ocean D. contnetal slop
    8·1 answer
  • A 0.216 g sample of carbon dioxide, CO2, has a volume of 507 mL and a pressure of 470 mmHg. What is the temperature of the gas i
    10·1 answer
  • Prompt 2 - You are watching the Indy 500 car race on television with your brother. He says, "Did you know that
    14·1 answer
  • what modifications to either or both of the half-cell reactions would kim need to make if she wanted to use them to produce equa
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!