1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
morpeh [17]
1 year ago
8

In general, animals that are perceived by scientists as being relatively intelligent possess?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Free_Kalibri [48]1 year ago
5 0

In general, animals are perceived by scientists as being relatively intelligent possess by scientist.

Animals are then broken down into two sorts: vertebrates and invertebrates. Animals with a spine are vertebrates. Vertebrates belong to the phylum referred to as Phylum Chordata. Vertebrates are similarly broken down into five instructions: amphibians, birds, fish, mammals, and reptiles.

We can define animal intelligence as the combination of talents and abilities that allow animals to stay in and adapt to their unique environments. What does this actually imply? Animals possess the potential to conform to their surroundings via gaining knowledge of to exchange their habits and behaviors.

Learn more about a general animal here:brainly.com/question/25897306

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
What is classified under the factors of production as land
erma4kov [3.2K]

Answer:b

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What are trade qoutass
laiz [17]
Wait what do I mean by that
7 0
2 years ago
The Mexican culture has a tendency to accept large power distances. That is, in general, Mexicans believe that everyone has thei
Keith_Richards [23]

The correct answer is A) Bosses and subordinates each view the other as different types of people.

The Mexican culture has a tendency to accept large power distances. That is, in general, Mexicans believe that everyone has their place in an order of bosses and subordinates each view the other as different types of people.

Mexican workers have a peculiar way of thinking regarding the workplace and the bosses. Unfortunately for most Mexicans, they want to feel secure in a workplace with a salary and the certainty that their work is safe and they are going to keep it forever. And that is not the case anymore.

Mexican workers are not entrepreneurs who like to go and try something different, who wants to grow through meet different challenges in the workplace and having risks to overcome difficulties and aspire to new and better work positions.

They see their bosses so far away in the organizational hierarchy and do not have an interest -both, bosses and workers- to meet in the middle to try to establish a better relationship that helps the company to be more productive and the workers to grow and prosper.

5 0
2 years ago
1-2 Discussion: Agency Previous Next Read Case 34-2, Iglesia Cristiana La Casa Del Senor, Inc. v. L.M., on page 778. Explain the
stira [4]

Answer:

In the understanding of this court case, where the plaintiff (L.M.) filed a lawsuit against Pacheco on sexual abuse, the court ruled that the perpetration of the abhorrent act committed did not have to do with Pacheco´s ´´scope of employment´´ as the act happened outside the boundaries of the church and not within his working hours. However, if the plaintiff were to argue that in fact this conduct happened within the scope of employment, she would have to explain and convince that Pacheco was indeed responsible as it is a Pastor's duty and responsibility to guide and counsel at all hours, and not just limited to his church´s hours. A pastor is a figure of responsibility as a visible head for a community, not to mention that in some churches, a pastor is also a legal representative.  

Employers should be held liable for the acts of their employees whenever there is a failure to supervise employees or some kind of misdemeanor is perpetrated within the employer´s work facilities or influential premises. These points of view however, are not stated by a lawyer/judicially, these are my personal observations after having researched on the case.

3 0
3 years ago
Which moral philosophy evaluates the morality of an action on the basis of its consequences for everyone affected (seeks the gre
Ket [755]

Answer:

utilitarianism is the correct answer.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did we keep the name florida
    12·1 answer
  • Sports managers can serve as executive directors of athletic organizations. True False
    11·2 answers
  • What function did taboos serve in Hawaii?
    13·1 answer
  • Help me please? :((((
    11·1 answer
  • _____ is defined as a philosophy and collection of planned change interventions designed to improve an organization's long-term
    7·1 answer
  • A person who wants to keep the economic, political, and social structures of society in place with minimal government involvemen
    15·2 answers
  • True / false: psychological egoism extols selfishness as a virtue that is to be pursued.
    15·1 answer
  • 2:<br>Why are there so few people in the Himalayan Regir<br>on of Nepal zo<br>lon​
    7·2 answers
  • Someone please help me
    11·1 answer
  • Retired cowboy chases the wild horse in the barn. Highlight the preposition
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!