Answer:
400; 800
Explanation:
Contribution:
Product X:
= Selling price - Variable cost
= 100 - 70
= 30,
Product Y:
= Selling price - Variable cost
= 80 - 40
= 40,
Product Z:
= Selling price - Variable cost
= 25 - 20
= 5
Machine hours required :
Product X:
= Machine time per unit × Monthly demand
= 3 × 300
= 900,
Product Y:
= Machine time per unit × Monthly demand
= 2 × 200
= 400,
Product Z:
= Machine time per unit × Monthly demand
= 1 × 500
= 500
Contribution per machine hour:
Product X = Contribution ÷ Machine time per unit
= 30 ÷ 3
= 10,
Product Y = Contribution ÷ Machine time per unit
= 40 ÷ 2
= 20,
Product Z = Contribution ÷ Machine time per unit
= 5 ÷ 1
= 5
It is highest for Y, so produce maximum amount of Y, then X and then Z
Y needs 400 hrs, we are left with 800 hours, so produce 800 hours of X.
I believe the answer is: high magnitude of consequences.
Event with high magnitude of consequences refers to the type of event which resulted in negative impact for a large number of people (such as loss of many jobs, destruction of health, etc) . Such event usually ignited by immoral actions that conducted for small group of people to obtain certain level of profit or desire.
Answer:
the acid-test ratio is 0.75 times
Explanation:
The computation of the acid-test ratio is shown below:
We know that
Acid-test ratio is
= Quick assets ÷ current liabilities
= $6,123,000 ÷ $8,144,000
= 0.75 times
Hence, the acid-test ratio is 0.75 times
basically we divided the quick assets from the current liabilities so that the acid-test ratio could come
Answer:
1 year rate 2 year from now = 12% (Approx)
Explanation:
Given:
1-year rate = 8%
2-year rate = 9%
3-year rate = 10%
Computation:
According to Pure Expectations Hypothesis,
(1 + 3-year rate)³ = (1 + 2-year rate)² (1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now)
(1.10)³ = (1 + 1.09)²(1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now)
1.331 = 1.1881 (1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now)
(1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now) = 1.12
1 year rate 2 year from now = 0.12
1 year rate 2 year from now = 12% (Approx)
Answer: A.exceed units sold
Explanation:
In Absorption Costing, All costs be it Fixed or Variable that are directly related to production are considered when computing the Cost of Production.
Under Variable Costs however, only variable Costs are considered for the computing of Cost of Production.
This difference in consideration of costs under each method leads to difference in income determination under each method.
Under Absorption Costing, fixed manufacturing costs are apportioned on produced units and the costs are only recovered when the units are sold but under variable costing, fixed manufacturing costs are treated as period costs and are therefore charged to the Income statement.
This means that, the amount of income under absorption costing will be more than the amount of income under variable costing when units manufactured exceed units sold.
