Answer:
<u><em>The answer is:</em></u> team participation to perform strategy-critical activities in light of prevailing circumstances.
Explanation:
The good execution of the strategy is mainly related to the ability of managers to involve all operational areas and all employees in the process of participating in the strategic actions that were developed to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Therefore, managers have an essential role in exercising control, coordination and monitoring of the teams, so that the execution of the strategy takes place in an effective and active manner, being shared as a responsibility and efforts of the entire team.
Answer:
Krell's dividend yield and equity cost of capital are 4.23% and 19.95%
Explanation:
Dividend yield = expected dividend/price today
= $ 0.89/$ 21.05
= 4.23%
Equity cost of capital = (Ending share price - Initial price + Dividend per share) / Initial price * 100
= [($24.36 - $21.05 + 0.89)/$21.05]*100
= 19.95%
Therefore, Krell's dividend yield and equity cost of capital are 4.23% and 19.95%
Answer:
win based on strict liability
Explanation:
Strict liability is a liability that is imposed on party by the claimant that proves that an action occurred and the defendant is responsible for it.
This provision does not require the claimant to prove a fault by the defendant. It is mostly used when an action is considered dangerous.
In this scenario Mike was blasting some holes in rocks. This is a dangerous activity that can cause harm.
Myra who broke her legs in the explosion only needs to prove Mike was responsible for the explosion that occurred for her to win based on strict liability provision.
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
