Title VII involves employers with 15 or more employees.
<h3>What is civil rights act?</h3>
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 stands as a landmark civil rights and labor law in the United States that outlaws prejudice established on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. The Civil Rights Act of 196( Pub. L. 86–449, 74 Stat. 89, legislated May 6, 1960) is a United States federal law that specified federal inspection of local voter registration polls and presented penalties for anyone who obstructed someone's endeavor to register to vote.
Title VII exists a provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which restricts prejudice in virtually every employment circumstance founded on race, color, religion, gender, pregnancy, or national origin. In general, Title VII spreads to employers with 15 or more employees.
Both employment instruments and unions may be subject to Title VII'S prohibition even when they negotiate with uncovered employers. An employment agency exists protected by Title VII if it regularly provides employees to employers with 15 or more employees even if, in a distinct case, the employer has more infrequent than 15 employees.
To learn more about civil rights act refer to:
brainly.com/question/11079956
#SPJ4
The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.
For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means
- There are two types of tortious interference
- Tortious interference with contract
- Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
- Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project
From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct
Learn more Tort interference from:
brainly.com/question/15058912
Answer:
none of the above
Explanation:
once you start the car the doors should automatically lock they only unlock once the car isnt moving or if in the event that the airbag is deployed
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "National supremacy".
Explanation:
- A term used only to characterize the United States Constitution's power over laws put in place by nations that might be at variance with either the ideals maintained by the fathers of the republic once they established the transitional government, is National supremacy.
- Article VI of that same Constitution provides for American sovereignty, which ensures that state statutes could not prevail over or refute Congressional legislation or US Supreme court decisions.
Therefore, National supremacy is the right answer.
