1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
garri49 [273]
4 years ago
10

Which of the following is an example of self-incrimination?

Law
1 answer:
finlep [7]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B C & D

Explanation:

All of the suspects told the officers evidence that pointed mostly at them for the culprit but didn't confess

You might be interested in
A case goes to trial, the case must take place where?<br> a cas<br> case mus
Brums [2.3K]

Answer:

In a crimanal trial it would be where the jursdicion is

4 0
3 years ago
Match the police ranks to the appropriate descriptions.
laila [671]
Detective, sergeant, inspector, police commissioner
7 0
3 years ago
How many states must pass the Amendment?
svp [43]

Answer: Congress must call a convention for proposing amendments upon application of the legislatures of two-thirds of the states (i.e., 34 of 50 states). Amendments proposed by Congress or convention become valid only when ratified by the legislatures of, or conventions in, three-fourths of the states (i.e., 38 of 50 states).

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The exclusionary rule states that if evidence is found during an illegal search, itmust be destroyed immediately.cannot be admit
LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:

Option 2 is the right answer

Explanation:

When government obtains any evidence though a conduct deemed unconstitutional (unlawful search or seizure), such evidence would be suppressed by the court. When the defendant is brought to court for eventual trial, such evidence would be inadmissible. U.S courts have used this rule in several occasions, to prevent police officers and agents of the government from abusing constitutional rights of the people.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Patrick borrowed his friend John’s car to impress a young lady he was dating. It was a new luxury car that John had saved four y
larisa [96]

Answer:

Yes <em>and</em> no.

Patrick <em>would</em> be liable for negligence in <em>allowing</em> the hail damage, as he <em>failed</em> to fulfill his duty of taking reasonable care of the vehicle.

However, he would<em> not</em> be responsible for the hot oil and gravel nicks.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Outline the process by which most federal judges are nominated and approved
    14·1 answer
  • In a typical ________ procedure, parties select a disinterested and informed party or parties to serve as a referee to determine
    6·2 answers
  • Which feature of a microblog allows a user to repost another user's content?
    6·1 answer
  • If Irene accepts goods shipped from Indonesia that were wrongfully obtained, has she committed an intentional tort against prope
    12·1 answer
  • If an attorney makes an appeal on the principle of Substantive Due Process what is being challenged? Use an example to explain y
    5·1 answer
  • According to a constitutional court, what is the source of African values?<br><br><br><br><br>​
    5·2 answers
  • With a delayed reaction time, drivers need ...
    10·1 answer
  • What is your ideal society? explain.​
    6·1 answer
  • Explain which of the United Nations purposes you think is the most important.
    14·1 answer
  • M BEGGING PLEASE HELPPPPP
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!