The term spillover refers to a market exchange that affects a third party who is outside or external to the exchange
Answer:
7 loans were made to clients with Graduate education who also had 17 years of experience
Explanation:
We have to solve for which is the intersection between the two groups.
66 is the count for +17 years
83 is the count for Graduate
the two groups is 149 loans
Then, we have 142 loans which are not part of both groups. Therefore, the difference are the loan count which do belong to both groups:
149 total loans - 142 loans out = 7
Answer:
X is $30,000
Explanation:
First, we need to calculate the Amount ofLoan
Amount of Loan = Car price - Down payment = $100,848 - $30,000 = $70,848
This is the situation of annuity payment for 4 years at a 25% interest rate with equal annuity payment each year.
Now we will use the following formula to calculate the value of X
PV of Annuity = Annuity payment x ( 1 - ( 1 + interest rate )^-numbers of years ) / Interest rate
Where
PV of Annuity = Amount of Loan = $70,848
Interest rate = 25%
Numbers of years = 4 years
Annuity Payment = X = ?
Placing values in the formula
$70,848 = X x ( 1 - ( 1 + 25% )^-4 ) / 25%
$70,848 = X x 2.3616
X = $70,848 / 2.3616
X = $30,000
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Brand equity is strategically important and correlates directly to Under Armour's profitability.
Explanation:
Brand equity refers to the perception consumers have about a firm that affects its value. Brand equity could be positive or negative. It is an important element for companies aiming to settle in the market through marketing strategies that generate more profits by attracting more customers. Brand equity can be measured by <em>price, customer satisfaction, popularity, brand awareness </em>or <em>market share.</em>
<em />
<em>Thus, the marketing team of Under Armour could state that conducting a brand equity measurement is crucial because it is related to the firm's ability to generate profit.</em>
The lawyer should make a motion for summary judgment.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
A motion for summary judgement can be considered as a request that is made to the court for ruling other party that it has no case since there were no facts on the case. When the party makes the motion, it claims that the jury must rule in the moving party's side or the case should not move before a jury.
A party can involve in filing a motion for summary judgment when the party feels that there are no facts in the case or problem. In the example given, there exists no evidence against the doctor and hence no jury can rule in favor of the plaintiff. Thus, the Doctor's lawyer should make a motion for summary judgment.
