Question

Identify the strengths and limitations of the forgoing ethical analysis in terms of how well it addresses each the 10 intellectual standards for assessing the integrity of ethical reasoning: accountability, duties, consequences, breadth, relevance, clarity, accuracy, limits of information, prioritizing, mitigation (1.5 points each). Be sure to include a discussion as you see the policy counter to the principles of trauma informed practice or that retraumatize, victimize, or oppress. Make sure you provide evidence and justification of each of these standards within the provided scenario.

Answer 1

We postulate that there are at least nine intellectual standards important to skilled reasoning in everyday life

What is  intellectual standards?

The term "standard" refers to the level of quality that a given item possesses. As a result, a "intellectual standard" is one that assesses the overall worth of a scholarly effort. Essays, reports, assignments, group discussions, and even notetaking are subject to such standards.

We believe that there are at least nine intellectual standards that are essential for skilled reasoning in everyday life. Clarity, precision, accuracy, relevance, depth, breadth, logicalness, significance, and fairness are examples.

When applied to thinking, universal intellectual standards provide a means of checking the quality of reasoning about a problem, issue, situation, or question.

To know more about  intellectual standards follow the link:

brainly.com/question/1549591

#SPJ4