Answer:
Jan. 22
Dr Cash $7,140,000
Cr Common Stock $6,300,000
Cr Paid in capital in excess of par $840,000
Feb. 27
Dr Cash $180,000
Cr Preferred Stock $135,000
Cr Paid-In Capital in Excess of Par-Preferred $45,000
Explanation:
Preparation of the entries for January 22 and February 27.
Jan. 22
Dr Cash $7,140,000
(210,000*$34)
Cr Common Stock $6,300,000
(210,000*$30)
Cr Paid in capital in excess of par $840,000
($7,140,000-$6,300,000)
Feb. 27
Dr Cash $180,000
(15,000*$12)
Cr Preferred Stock $135,000
(15,000*$9)
Cr Paid-In Capital in Excess of Par-Preferred $45,000
($180,000-$135,000)
Once a company reaches 50 or more employees, and meets any of the below criteria, it has 120 days to create an Affirmative Action Plan. Every year the company remains larger than 50 employees and meets the federal contracts guidelines listed below, it is required to update the plan to track changes in employee population and employee transactions.
In some instances, companies are required to implement an Affirmative Action Plan without a direct government contract. If government contractors purchase at least $50,000 worth of goods to fulfill their obligations on a government contract, then the goods’ seller is also subject to the OFFCP’s laws.
A prime example is a hardware company which sells screws to a company that builds Navy submarines. Although there’s no direct contract with the government for the hardware company, accepting the order as part of a government contract makes it a bill of lading, and if it exceeds $50,000 total revenue on those deals, then both sides must comply with Affirmative Action law.
Answer:
$40,000
Explanation:
If Alan had paid the disability insurance himself, then disability income would not be taxable. But since Alan's employer paid the disability insurance premiums, then any disability payments that Alan received must be included in his gross income and are taxable.
Answer:
He should tell his coworker that there is mistakes, but in a polite way.
Explanation:
hope this helps
The question is reconstructed below:
Which of the following best describes a Nash equilibrium?
A. An outcome from which one or both competitors can improve their position by adopting an alternative strategy.
B. The unstable outcome of a repeated game.
C. An outcome that is stable only because of credible threats.
D. An outcome which both competitors see as optimal, given the strategy of their rival.
Answer:
D. An outcome which both competitors see as optimal, given the strategy of their rival.
Explanation:
Although Nash equilibrium is a game theory, it has been widely applied in economics. It states that a competitor can achieve his desired outcome by sticking to his original strategy. Both competitors' strategies are optimal when considering the decisions of each other.
