1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariana [72]
2 years ago
6

Are 14, 6 + 8, and (6 + 8) equivalent expressions? Explain your reasoning.

Mathematics
1 answer:
Sloan [31]2 years ago
4 0

The expressions 14, 6 + 8, and (6 + 8) are equivalent because they are all equal to 1

<h3>Equivalent expression</h3>

14

6 + 8

= 14

(6 + 8)

= 14

The coefficient of (6 + 8) is 1, so, the expression remains the same.

<h3>What is equivalent expression?</h3>

Equivalent expressions refers to those expressions that work the same even though they look different.

The importance or significance of equivalent expression is that its makes expressions easier to work with and solve.

Therefore, the expressions 14, 6 + 8, and (6 + 8) are all equivalent to 14.

Learn more about equivalent expression:

brainly.com/question/15775046

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Gavin received 91 points on his test but received a 70% as his grade. How many points were possible on the test?
lakkis [162]
I believe its 130 points... im sorry if its wrong
4 0
3 years ago
For a real number a, a+ 0 = a
mel-nik [20]


I think it's true.
Because any number added to 0 is equal to itself.
5 0
4 years ago
Can you help me with one and 2 please
pashok25 [27]

for 1 it's 1/8 and the second is and the other is 1/15 of an hour

5 0
4 years ago
Explain why using either compatible numbers or rounding as a method for estimation would be the same for 32×695?
Kaylis [27]
<span>The question here is why using either compatible numbers or rounding as a method for estimation would be the same?
Well, we use rounding as a method of estimation to get a solution in a certain equation faster yet the same.
For example, in the given equation we have 32 x 695
=> Instead of 32, we can use 30
=> instead of 695, we can use 700
=>  30 x 700
=> the answer is 21 000
Now, let’s multiply the exact number
=> 32 * 695
=> 22 240
Not, really exact yet close.
That’s how estimation works.

</span>



5 0
3 years ago
3.4:More Matching Moves
Darina [25.2K]

Step 1: Both sides are divided by 2.

Step 2: 3 is added to both sides.

Step 3: Both sides are divided by 6.

A: x + 3 = 4/3 + 3

B: x+3/6 = (4/3 + 3)/6

C: x+3/12 = (4/3 + 3)/12

Hope this helped!

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which set of numbers is arranged from least to greatest.
    11·1 answer
  • Leaves were falling off a tree at an exponential rate beginning Oct.1, on the 10th there were 5287 leaves. On the 21st there wer
    10·1 answer
  • Internet connection problems bumped 3/8 of the24 students.How many students were bumped off?
    12·1 answer
  • the ratio of lynx to mountain lions and wolverines in the park is 2:3:1. So far every 2 lynx there are 3 mountain lions and 1 wo
    5·1 answer
  • Please answer fast it will be very helpfull please it is a humble requst A samosa costs Rs 5 and a cold drink costs Rs 10. You t
    6·1 answer
  • The number of ounces of water a person drinks per day is normally distributed with a standard deviation of 15 ounces. If Sean dr
    5·1 answer
  • Help me please. Very much appreciated​
    8·2 answers
  • Twelve decreased by half a number is 6. Find the number.
    6·1 answer
  • Express the product of (x + 1) and (3/2x+5/3)as a trinomial in simplest<br> form.
    6·1 answer
  • Divide 4 metre in the ratio 2:5​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!