When we speak of the Great Schism<span>, we can actually be referring to one of </span>two schisms<span>. The first is also called the </span>East-West Schism<span> and happened in 1054 when the Byzantine Church broke from the Roman Catholic Church. The second is also referred to as the </span>Great Western Schism<span> and happened between 1378 and 1417 when a pope in Rome and a second pope in Avignon, France, proclaimed themselves to be the real pope. Both schisms </span>significantly affected<span> the Roman Catholic Church. Though, typically, that which is called the Great Schism refers to the </span>East-West Schism.
<span>The </span>greatest effect<span> of the </span>East-West Schism<span> was the creation of two separate churches that had previously been unified under one church, the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church. But more specifically, the schism had developed over time due to "doctrinal, theological, linguistic, political, and geographic" differences; therefore, the schism also affected Catholicism by </span>solidifying these differences<span> (</span>New World Encyclopedia,<span> "Great Schism"</span>).
<span>The greatest </span>theological and political difference<span> concerns the belief in the</span><span> authority of the pope</span><span>. The Roman Catholic Church holds that, as the successor of Saint Peter, the pope holds all authority over the Church. However, the Eastern Church feels the title of pope to be </span>only an honorary one, so the church believes the pope has no authority to "determine policy" for all jurisdictions in the empire ("Great Schism").
A second significant theological difference concerns the<span> objection</span><span> of the</span><span>insertion of the<span> filioque</span> clause</span><span> in the Nicene Creed. The Nicene Creed is the statement of the Catholic Church's faith. The </span>filioque<span> clause refers to a specific statement of faith in the creed concerning the Holy Trinity; more specifically, the statement can be interpreted to mean that the Holy Spirit comes only from the Father or from both the Father and the Son. It is referred to as the filioque clause because the Latin word filioque translates to mean "and from the son." The </span>Eastern Church<span> changed their </span>creed to read<span>, "We believe in the Holy Spirit ... who proceeds from the Father," whereas the </span>Roman Catholic creed reads<span>, "We believe in the Holy Spirit ... who proceeds from the Father and the Son" ("Great Schism"; </span>"Filioque Clause"<span>)</span>
Answer:
<em>It was used as the Germans' firstline of defence. I guess it was to drive the people away during World War 1 in 1987.</em>
:)
It is referred to as Bi-Laterael meaning two separate but equal parts
I think that the best answer is "c. an incentive to bring their ideas to market" - you can see that through the statement of "<span>the opportunity to profit from their ideas"- an opportunity to profit is an incentive to work and in the case of the creators - to bring their ideas to market.
However, an opportunity to profit is not a guarantee that one will profit - so for example option a) is wrong. </span>
The social, economic, political, and religious events that shaped the composition of work are referred to as the historical context.
<h3>Why is knowledge of historical context crucial?</h3>
The time frame in which a story takes place is referred to as the historical context. Social context is a reflection of how the events taking place in and around the period and location where the characters live have an impact on their actions and attitudes.
In literature, having a clear understanding of the historical background of a work's creation can help us better comprehend and value the story. Context can aid in our analysis of historical events by allowing us to better comprehend the reasons behind people's actions.
For more information about the historical context refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/2020122
#SPJ4
