All categories

2 years ago

what is the true difference between consultative leadership and participative leadership in decisiion making?

1 answer:

5 0

The difference between consultative leadership and participative leadership in decision making is that in consultative leadership employees do not have decision-making power they can only share their opinions but in participative leadership, everyone works together for decision making.

A leader who shares decision-making with organization participants. 3 subtypes of participative leaders consist of consultative, consensus, and democratic. Consultative leaders confer with subordinates earlier than you make a decision; but, they maintain the authority to make very last selections.

Consultative leadership fashion is set growing the capacity to persuade people in place of enforcing their authority on them, enticing the subordinates or employees efficiently in the decision making. Such leaders ask humans for their minds & permit them to technique the problem and locate a nice feasible solution. The consultative chief uses the talents, thoughts, and enjoyment of others, however, the final choice is made by using a leader. Such a leader has interacted with his time or more important tasks, gives proper popularity, and evaluates all the alternatives before making the very last choice.

The participative leader entails himself because a member of the group & makes choices alongside the group. Such a leader seeks consensus and all and sundry have to take possession within the final decision. In a participative management fashion team participants and leaders, thoughts are taken into consideration as identical, and the body's input is considered. right here leader is a facilitator, educates, and frequently embraces crew thoughts over their very own, creating a tradition of innovation and focusing on promoting creativity.

Learn more about participative leadership here brainly.com/question/20464132

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

The following information pertains to Lightning Inc., at the end of December: Credit Sales $ 20,000 Accounts Payable 10,000 Acco

timama [110]

Answer:

The appropriate amount of Bad Debt Expense is $3,345.20.

Explanation:

The appropriate amount of Bad Debt Expense can be calculated as follows:

Bad debt expense = (Percentage of accounts receivable not yet due it will not collect * Accounts receivable not yet due) + (Percentage of receivables up to 30 days past due it will not collect * Amount of receivables up to 30 days past due) + (Parentage of receivables of receivables greater than 30 days past due it will not collect * Amount of receivables greater than 30 days past due) - Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts (credit) ……………………… (1)

Substituting the relevant values into equation (1), we have:

Bad debt expense = (7% * $7,500) + (20% + $2,300) + (46% * $2,000) - $400 = $3,345.20

Therefore, the appropriate amount of Bad Debt Expense is $3,345.20.

3 0

3 years ago

The Company deposits $6,900 in an account that earns interest at an annual rate of 8%, compounded quarterly. The $6,900 plus ear

astra-53 [7]

Answer:

$8750.87

Explanation:

This is compound interest problem. The formula used to solve this would be:

$F=P(1+r)^t$

Where

F is the future value (what we want, after 3 years)

P is the initial value (given 6900)

r is the rate of interest per period

here, 8% per year, so 8/4 = 2% per period (since compounded per quarter)

t is the time (3 years and compounding per year so times of compounding is 3*4 = 12), so t = 12

Substituting, we get our answer:

$F=P(1+r)^t\\F=6900(1+0.02)^{12}\\F=6900(1.02)^{12}\\F=8750.87$

<u>There will be about $8750.87 at the account at the end of 3 years!</u>

8 0

3 years ago

Determine the missing amounts. Unit Selling Price Unit Variable Costs Unit Contribution Margin Contribution Margin Ratio 1. $900

Pie

Answer:

(a) = $468

(b) = 52%

(d) = 28%

(e) = $1150

(f) = $920

Explanation:

selling price variable cost contribution margin contribution ratio

1. $900 $432 (a) $ (b)%

2. $200 $ (c) $56 (d)%

3. $ (e) $(f) $230 20%

contribution = selling price - variable costs

Margin contribution ratio = contribution / sales

Variable cost = selling price - contribution

Selling price = contribution / margin contribution ratio

5 0

3 years ago

S2→ S1→ S→ M→ D→ R→ C→ C1→C2

katovenus [111]

Answer:

sorry but I can't understand this question

6 0

3 years ago

Lillich, Inc., manufactures and sells two products: Product U6 and Product R5. Data concerning the expected production of each p

Goryan [66]

Answer:

Lillich, Inc.

c. The unit product cost of Product U6 under traditional costing is greater than its unit product cost under activity-based costing by $5.63.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Direct labor rate = $28.00 per DLH

Product U6 Product R5 Total

Expected production 690 1,060

Direct materials cost/unit $250.40 $167.80

Direct Labor Hours/unit 8.9 5.9

Total direct labor hours 6,141 6,254 12,395

Direct labor costs $171,948 ($28*6,141) $175,112 ($28*6,254)

Total direct materials cost $172,776 ($250.4*690) $177,868 ($167.8*1,060)

Total overhead $636,360 $658,752 $1,295,112

Total production cost $981,084 $1,011,732

Expected production 690 1,060

Cost per unit $1,421.86 $954.46

Traditional costing:

Direct labor costs $171,948 ($28*6,141) $175,112 ($28*6,254)

Total direct materials cost $172,776 ($250.4*690) $177,868 ($167.8*1,060)

Total overhead $641,612 $653,418 $1,295,112

Total production cost $986,336 $1,006,398

Expected production 690 1,060

Cost per unit $1,429.47 $949.43

Allocation of overhead based on direct labor hours

= $ 1,295,086/12,395

= $104.48 per DLH

Product U6 = $641,612 ($104.48 * 6,141)

Product R5 = $653,418 ($104.48 * 6,254)

Estimated Expected Activity

Activity Cost Pools Activity Overhead Product Product Total

Measures Costs U6 R5

Labor-related DLHs $ 201,638 7,125 7,280 14,405

Production orders Orders 72,840 1,350 1,250 2,600

Order size MHs 1,020,608 6,500 6,800 13,300

Total $ 1,295,086

Overhead rates:

Labor-related = $201,638/14,405 = $14.00 per DLH

Production orders = $72,840/2,600 = $28.00 per order

Order size = $1,020,608/13,300 = $76.74 per machine hour

Overhead allocation:

Product U6 Product R5 Total

Labor-related $99,750 (7,125*$14) $101,920 (7,280*$14) $201,670

Production orders 37,800 (1,350*$28) 35,000 (1,250*$28) 72,800

Order size 498,810 (6,500*$76.74) 521,832 (6,800*$76.74) 1,020,642

Total overhead $636,360 $658,752 $1,295,112

5 0

3 years ago