False.
Federal court jurisdiction is limited to certain types of cases listed in the US constitution
13 because the 13 colonies wrote it
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
The state trial court in Nevada has issued a decision in which a party has been found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada courts will be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision.
Answer:
No, should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada state trial courts will not be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision, because the decisions of trial courts do not use precedents or rulings established in previous legal cases to arrive at decisions on future disputes involving different or entirely new parties.
Answer:
majority
Explanation:
a bill needs to have a majority vote because that means more people agree/like [with] it
The first 8 amendments stated Criminal Prosecutions, and citizen's restrictions. (for the most part). These all were fair rights that essentially founded the standpoint for the laws of today. Since these were the first amendments. Congress had to get the important and obvious ones out of the way first. This means they are important to the US and it's way of function.
