It’s false i think because there are still a lot of cops killing people
Answer:
The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.
Explanation:
The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.
Answer:
Supreme Court justices do not announce their decisions on cases right away. ... For a final ruling, at least five of the nine justices must agree. One or more of those justices is asked to write the “majority opinion.” Justices who disagree may write a “minority opinion.” All opinions are released.
Explanation:
Plz mark me as brainiest
1. yes. like the jim crow laws. they discriminated against african americans and made things very unfair. it was completely legal, but not moral at all. it’s very inhuman to treat others like that
2. yes. like helping a holocaust victim escape or hide from the nazi’s. it was illegal but people wanted to do it to help and protect them