On a graph, an equilibrium is the point where a supply curve and a demand curve meet. Hope this helps =)
Answer:
In the first past the post system, as the name implies, the party or candidate winning the a plurality of votes obtains all the political seats being contested.
For example, suppose we have three parties, and 20 seats being contested in a fictional election. The results are:
Red party - 60%
Green party - 30%
Blue party - 10%
Under a first past the post system, the Red Party would obtain all the 20 seats.
Under a proportional system, on the other hand, each party or candidate gets a proportional amount of seats corresponding to the percentage of the votes.
For example, if the number of seats contested is 20, and we obtain the same results as above, the number of seats for each party (in bold) would be:
Red party - 60% - 12 seats
Green party - 30% - 6 seats
Blue party - 10% - 2 seats
The answer is written by experts in their field of study.
Let us first define what is euphoria. Euphoria is when an individual experiences pleasure or excitement. This is when a person also feels intense feelings of well-being and happiness. When you have this feeling, you are having the best time of your life. There are already a lot of references that directly relate exercise and happiness. One reference says that being fit really has a huge impact on our mental health, moods and happiness. Take another basis which says that getting yourself a workout routine will make you take of your mind from all the worries and stress of out of your busy life. Eventually, this will then for sure create happiness.
He discussed for democracy, but not for freedom, appealing
that anyone who differs with the general will should be involuntary to monitor
it. He appears to be supporting something like an "absolute
democracy" with complete civil equality, a factual democracy before a
republic, and he openly says that political parties would weaken or disintegrate
a political system founded on the general will.
A dictatorship crashes with this wholly for the reason that whoever governs
the country is not governmentally equal with the rest of the individuals and
can create an oppression of an individual or party. He is disagreeing for a tyranny of the
majority.