A senator, near the end of his first six-year term and running for reelection, made the claim: "Citizens of our state are thrivi
ng. While national unemployment levels have remained high, our state unemployment rate has been at astonishingly low levels for eleven years running. Clearly, everyone in our state has benefitted from the economical packages I have introduced during my time in the Senate. Therefore, grateful citizens of our state ought to vote for my second term." This argument is most vulnerable to what criticism?
a) It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed.
b) It introduces several different types of evidence, not all of which are compatible with one another.
c) It conflates political conditions with economic conditions.
d) The economical packages introduced by the senator may not have been as beneficial to citizens of other states.
e) Even if what the senator is saying is true, it may not be in his self-interest to argue in favor of it.
a) It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed.
Explanation:
A senator, near the end of his first six-year term and running for reelection, made the claim: "Citizens of our state are thriving. While national unemployment levels have remained high, our state unemployment rate has been at astonishingly low levels for eleven years running. Clearly, everyone in our state has benefitted from the economical packages I have introduced during my time in the Senate. Therefore, grateful citizens of our state ought to vote for my second term."
This argument is most vulnerable to what criticism? It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed.The senator's argument says that the condition which is low unemployment in the state is the effect of his economic packages, but the condition existed before he ever had the chance to introduce those packages. That is the major flaw of this argument.
On the basis of boys family expect them as their caretaker and future caretakers of them as they aint go anywhere instead bring others daughters in their house and look after the parents while parents might treat their sons and daughters equally but they dnt keep expectations instead they wish for their best future while thsy have hope from their sons to keep theur generatuon alive and keep going.. Well my parents treat me and my brother the same way but i feel a little bad going others house after marriage and couldnt do anything for them
Instead of growing their own supply of corn (a New World crop unfamiliar to the English), the settlers relied heavily on corn grown by nearby Indians. But even with their neighbors' help, over 400 settlers would die over the winter of 1609-1610.