Answer:
19th; self-made manhood
Explanation:
Anthony Rotundo, an instructor in history and social sciences refers to the 19th century as the era of self-made manhood in his famous book titled American Manhood. He stressed that mahood is man made because an explicit emphasis on developing the individualistic character qualities such as self-control and independent decision-making considered necessary for manhood became more important
The 1967 Detroit riot, also known as the 12th Street riot or the 1967 Detroit rebellion, was one of 159 race riots that swept cities in the United States during the "Long Hot Summer of 1967". This riot was a violent public disorder that turned into a civil disturbance in Detroit, Michigan. It began in the early morning hours of Sunday July 23, 1967. The precipitating event was a police raid of an unlicensed, after-hours bar then known as a <span>blind pig,</span> just north of the corner of 12th Street (today Rosa Parks Boulevard) and Virginia Park Avenue, on the city's Near West Side. Police confrontations with patrons and observers on the street evolved into one of the deadliest and most destructive riots in the history of the United States, lasting five days and surpassing the violence and property destruction of Detroit's 1943 race riot just 24 years earlier.
To help end the disturbance, Governor George W. Romney ordered the Michigan Army National Guard into Detroit, and President Lyndon B. Johnson sent in both the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions. The result was 43 dead, 1,189 injured, over 7,200 arrests, and more than 2,000 buildings destroyed. The scale of the riot was surpassed in the United States only by the 1863 New York City draft riots during the American Civil War,[2] and the 1992 Los Angeles riots. The riot was prominently featured in the news media, with live television coverage, extensive newspaper reporting, and extensive stories in Time and Life magazines. The staff of the Detroit Free Press won the 1968 Pulitzer Prize for general local reporting for its coverage.
The first one:
It depends. Average Europeans didn't have a lot of contact with Native Americans, so had to trust secondary sources for their perception of them. These were usually either heavily glorified, or heavily vilified. There was a popular perception of the "Noble Savage" based off of French reports and paintings of the New World, where Natives were viewed as part of nature living in perfect harmony with nature, but lacking the proper tools for civilization. Some British journalists, merchants, and explorers brought back reports of cannibalism and a perception of the uncivilized savage. The Spanish, militantly Catholic, viewed the Indians as heathens ignorant of the teachings of Christ.
Most of the European views of Native people were shaped by their own cultural values and attitudes. Not very many knew about the diversity of the tribes, the vast cultural differences and traits that existed on this side of the world. In a way, Euro-South and North Americans still retain some of these stereotypes and misconceptions. For example, there is a very strong perception in most of North and South America by the non-aboriginal population, that Natives lived in absolute harmony with nature and that the land was 'untouched'. In reality, the Native groups greatly manipulated the landscape of North and South America, and in some cases, drastically altered the landscape.
Second:
The first effect of the Mexican-American War was the territorial gains made by the United States. At the end of the war, Mexico, through the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, ceded California (including Alta California) and New Mexico (which including what is now Arizona, Utah, and Nevada) to the United States, and established the Rio Grande as Texas’ southern border once and for all. This secession of land was completed for a final cost of approximately 15 million US dollars (and the U.S. replaced 3 million dollars in claims made against Mexico).
prt 2:
there was the internal dispute of slavery in the U.S. Even before the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed, there had been arguments over what would become of the territories if they were to be annexed into the United States. This was first seen in the Wilmot Proviso. Created by David Wilmot, it stated, “as an express and fundamental condition to the acquisition of any territory from the Republic of Mexico…neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist in any part of said territory” (Goldstein 425).
Answer:
Animals don't need energy from the sun, not directly anyway. Animals get energy from the food they eat. However, that food either got its energy by eating other food, or by photosynthesis, and sooner or later almost all energy on Earth comes from the sun.
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Trade-offs are in fact alternatives that must be given up when one choice is made rather than another :)
