1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRISSAK [1]
1 year ago
12

According to mesmer-magnus and viswesvaran, organizational employees have three options to address an unsatisfactory situation f

aced within an organization. these include?
Business
1 answer:
zavuch27 [327]1 year ago
7 0

According to Mesmer-Magnus and Viswesvaran, organizational employees have three options to address an unsatisfactory situation faced within an organization. These include: exiting the organization, remaining silent, voice discontent.

<h3>What are organizational employees?</h3>

They are the ones who effectively contribute to an organization's smooth operation. They work really hard to deliver what they promise and complete the specified tasks by the deadline. The culture of the workplace is significantly influenced by the personnel.

Through negotiation techniques, organizational members develop their identities as runners. Members take up the role of models for new members in a continuing identity. Running as a societal norm might be supported by an organization.

The foundation of a solid, long-lasting corporation is its workforce. No matter what level, employees are in charge of the company. This means that their fortitude, fidelity, and devotion, as well as their emotional ties to the company, cannot be valued as assets.

Mesmer-Magnus and Viswesvaran assert that there are three ways for organizational personnel to deal with problematic circumstances they encounter. These include leaving the company, keeping quiet, and voicing your dissatisfaction.

To learn more about organizational employees refer to:

brainly.com/question/1190099

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
If a country imposes a tariff on imported shoes, we expect the domestic price of shoes to ______ .
boyakko [2]

If a country imposes a tariff on imported shoes, we expect the domestic price of shoes to rise, domestic consumption to fall, and domestic production to rise.

A levy on imported goods is known as a tariff. The use of an example is the simplest way to explain how it operates. The US lumber industry is the example we've used throughout this section, and it's continuing below. The domestic equilibrium price and quantity in the domestic market are $1,000 per board foot and 40 million board feet, respectively. PD = $1,000 and QD = 40,000,000 are used to represent this. The world price, or PW, in this instance is significantly less than the local price. While this is not always the case, if PW is higher than PD, there is no reason to import (This model assumes that imports are identical to domestic products in every respect except for price).

American customers will buy a lot more lumber if they can obtain imports for as little as $400. The number of units they will be demanded will rise to 70 million (40 million more than the domestic equilibrium). With the improved accessibility to inexpensive lumber, these consumers are vastly better off.

The imports, on the other hand, cause domestic producers to lose a significant amount of surplus. Previously, they could have provided 40 million board feet of lumber for $1,000, but now they can only provide 10 million. This is due to the fact that many domestic companies will either exit the market or reduce production since they can no longer compete with the foreign production.

60 million board feet of lumber are imported from Canada out of a total production of 70 million board feet, 10 million of which are produced domestically.

To lean more about Tariffs from the given link.

brainly.com/question/26923792

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
McGraw purchased an antique rocking chair from Tillis by check. The check was dishonored by the bank due to insufficient funds.
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

Option C is the correct option.

Explanation:

As the rights and obligation of the antique rocking chair are been passed to third party, so the damage caused by the checque been bounced is the monetry consideration agreed between the party to the contract, McGraw and Tellis. So Tellis may recover money damages from McGraw. However there is a special condition that can allow Tellis recover his asset from Rio if the third party knew before purchase of this asset, that the checque paid to Tellis by McGraw was dishonoured but still he contracted with McGraw to acquire the antique rocking chair.

Overall the option C is the correct option with which the case scenario relates.

3 0
3 years ago
Malone Co. owned 70% of Bernard Corp.'s common stock. During November 2021, Bernard sold merchandise to Malone for $150,000. At
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

$18,000

Explanation:

Calculation to determine what The amount of intra-entity gross profit remaining in ending inventory at December 31, 2021 that should be eliminated in the consolidation process is:.

Using this formula

Intra-Entity Gross Profit =(Transfer Price × Percentage of Bernard's GP) × Intra-Entity Transfers Remaining in Ending Inventory

Let plug in the formula

Intra-Entity Gross Profit=($150,000×30% )×40%

Intra-Entity Gross Profit=$45,000×40%

Intra-Entity Gross Profit=$18,000

Therefore The amount of intra-entity gross profit remaining in ending inventory at December 31, 2021 that should be eliminated in the consolidation process is:$18,000

6 0
3 years ago
Craigmont uses the allowance method to account for uncollectible accounts. its year-end unadjusted trial balance shows accounts
marshall27 [118]
<span>$104,500 * 0.04 = $4,180 - $665 = $3,515</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Security M has expected return of 17% and standard deviation of 32%. Security S has expected return of 13% and standard deviatio
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

0.047424

Explanation:

Given that

Expected return of security M = 17%

Standard deviation of Security M = 32%

Expected return of security S = 13%

Standard deviation of security S = 19%

And, the correlation coefficient = 0.78

So, by considering the above information the co variance is

=  Correlation coefficient × Standard deviation of Security M × Standard deviation of security S

= 0.78 × 0.32 × 0.19

= 0.047424

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Working for a nonprofit company that lacks financial resources or working for a start-up company that lacks the infrastructure a
    5·1 answer
  • Assessment
    11·1 answer
  • On March 31, year 1, Ashley, Inc.'s bondholders exchanged their convertible bonds for common stock. The carrying amount of these
    10·1 answer
  • The _______ price is the point at which supply and demand for a good are equal.
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is (are) false?(A) Operations costing accounts for material costs like job costing and convers
    5·1 answer
  • During the most recent month, the following activity was recorded:_______.
    14·2 answers
  • What are the types of model risk
    14·1 answer
  • At April 30, Marigold Corp. has the following bank information: Cash balance per bank $5400 Outstanding checks $330 Deposits in
    5·1 answer
  • A storage tank acquired at the beginning of the fiscal year at a cost of $90,000 has an estimated residual value of $12,000 and
    11·1 answer
  • 100 free hope you do the same
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!