I may not even be close but I hope I at least helped a little bit. Maybe around 5,000.
Probably not even close. So sorry if it is wrong. Hope I helped
Answer:
Fraud
Explanation:
fraud
This is simply defines as a precised, well planned falsehood/deception with the sole aim so as to get an unfair or unlawful profits/gain.
The 5 elements of fraud
They simply includes: false representation of fact, knowledge of the falsehood by the party making the false representation, intent to deceive by party , reasonable reliance by the innocent party, actual loss suffered by innocent party
Misrepresentation
This is simply defined as an act of making an innocent statement that are usually false when the individual do seriously believed the statement was true at the time it was made.
Fraudulent Misrepresentation
It is a form of misrepresentation that is intentionally false and is intended to mislead others.
To recover damages caused by fraud, it includes the following:
1. Proof of harm is essentially required
2. The measure of damages is usually equal to the property's value had it been delivered as represented, less the price paid
3. courts may also award punitive or exemplary damages
The correct answer is<em> the misuse of cause and effect </em>which is a tendency to make conclusions based of the limited amount of facts that are presented. This often happens in medical studies, where, for the sake of the research study, we can see the misuse of the cause and effect relation.
Answer:
A.Relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch.
Explanation:
These are options for the question
A.Relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch.
B.Relevant, but only if the prosecution can prove that Charles Rogers and not his brother was the actual owner of the blowtorch.
C.Irrelevant, assuming the defendant can prove to the court in an offer of proof that his brother does in fact use the blowtorch for professional purposes.
D.Irrelevant, since it is not information that a person would want to know in deciding whether the defendant committed the crime.
From the question we are informed Charles Rogers who was accused of robbing a bank by breaking into the bank's vault after hours. The prosecution seeks to introduce evidence that a blowtorch was found in his garage. The defendant objects, pointing out that Rogers' brother, who shares the home with Rogers, is a professional pipe-fitter and uses the blowtorch every day for legitimate work. In this case The evidence is relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch. In a crime scene which is regarded as location that is been associated to the crime committed. In this scene physical evidence should be able to be provided so that investigation and persecution of those involving in the crime can be relevant and it will be easier for investigators as well as law enforcement
