Answer: Knowledge
Explanation: IDRC engages in expertise, creativity, and strategies to increase the quality of life in developing countries as a segment of Canada's international affairs and development activities. IDRC aims to address realistic development issues with the brilliant minds in Canada and across the globe.
In addition to promoting global stability and development, partnering with local academic institutions and financing agencies effectively decreases reliance on assistance while establishing political leadership.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the primary focus in the program is on knowledge.
Answer:
1.Jan 01 Dr Cash 360,000
Cr Notes payable 340,000
2.Interest expense 28,800
Principal Reduction 61,364
Explanation:
MM Co.
1 . Journal entry
Since MM Co. borrows $360,000 cash on January 1 from a bank this means we have to
Debit Cash with the amounts of money he borrowed which is $360,000 and Credit Notes Payable with the same amount.
Jan 01 Dr Cash 360,000
Cr Notes payable 340,000
2. Calculation of the amount goes toward interest expense and Principal reduction
Interest expense 28,800
(360,000*8%)
Principal Reduction 61,364
(90,164-28,800)
Answer:
$607,250 outflow
Explanation:
Net Working Capital is the amount of money needed to maintain operations on a day to day basis.
Net Working Capital = Current Assets - Current Liabilities
where,
<u>Current Assets are calculated as :</u>
Inventory $216,000
Accounts Receivable ($525,000 x 1.09) $575,250
Total $788,250
and
Current Liabilities = $181,000
therefore,
Net Working Capital = $788,250 - $181,000 = $607,250
Conclusion
The project's initial cash flow for net working capital is $607,250 outflow.
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Given that,
Price of low-quality apples = $1 per pound
Price of high-quality apples = $4 per pound
Marginal utility of low-quality apples = 3 utils
Marginal utility of high-quality apples = 12 utils
Equimarginal:
(Marginal utility of low quality apples ÷ Price per apple) = (Marginal utility of high quality apples ÷ Price per apples)
(3 utils ÷ $1) = (12 utils ÷ $4)
3 = 3
Yes, Timmy is maximizing his utility as his equimarginal utility is same for both the goods as shown above.
We would need to see the graph, but the equilibrium point is where the wage paid is equal to the supply of workers. On a graph, this would be the point where the two lines intersect. That is the point where the supply of people willing to do the job at a certain rate, meets the company's demand for workers and the rate they are willing to pay.
