Answer:
The answer is: Normative leadership model
Explanation:
The normative leadership model requires Pier to analyze the following seven situations:
- How will my decision will affect the organization?
- Is it important that team members are committed to the decision making process.?
- As a leader, do I possess the knowledge to solve try to solve this issue?
- If only I are responsible for making the decision, will the rest of the team be committed to it?
- My team members support me and the organization?
- The team members possess the knowledge to try to solve this issue?
- Can team members unite and really work as a team to solve this issue?
Depending on what Pier believes the correct answers are for the above questions, he can decide to use one of the following decision making processes:
- Decide: Pier makes the decision by himself with little or no participation of the team members.
- Consult (Individually): Pier consults the team members individually, deciding what information to use, and then makes a decision by himself.
- Consult (Group): Pier organizes a group meeting where all members express their opinions, then decides what information is useful and makes the decision by himself.
- Facilitate: Pier organizes a group meeting and presents his opinion and every group member participates. The decision is made by group consensus.
- Delegate: Pier leaves the decision making process entirely to the group members and doesn't participate in it.
Answer:
D. Any advantage that one firm has will be short-lived.
Explanation:
With the three firms all producing the same product with similar resources in their production and distribution of their products, any advantage that a firm has over the others if any would not last long at all. This is because each firm is using similar technique in the same location. Hence, there's nothing special about one of the firms over the others.
Answer:
To enforce this promise we need to analyse whether there has been any agreement or contract between Sarah and Odessa and whether the same can be enforced.
Explanation:
In Sarah's case, her offer to gratuitously pay the neighbor for assisting in the house fire is not an enforceable contract. When the neighbor rushed to help in the fire, the offer to pay $1,000 had not yet been extended. When Sarah did extend the offer to pay $1,000, there was no consideration exchanged between both parties. The consideration, putting out the fire, had already occurred without the offer or acceptance of a contract.
Consider an alternate scenario. Sarah's house was on fire, and she could not wait for the fire department. She ran to her neighbor's house, begged for help, and offered $1,000 in exchange for neighbor's assistance. After hearing Sarah's plea, the neighbor agrees to assist in extinguishing the fire. This constitutes a contract; an offer, consideration, and acceptance.
Answer:
The correct answer is C) purchase Canadian dollar put options.
Explanation:
A sale option (or put option) gives its holder the right - but not the obligation - to sell an asset at a predetermined price until a specific date. The seller of the option to sell has the obligation to buy the underlying asset if the holder of the option (buyer of the right to sell) decides to exercise his right.
The purchase of put options is used as hedging, when price falls are anticipated in shares that are held, since by means of the purchase of Put the price is established from which money is earned. If the stock falls below that price, the investor earns money. If the share price falls, the profits obtained with the sale option compensate in whole or in part for the loss experienced by said fall.
Losses are limited to the premium (price paid for the purchase of the sale option). Earnings increase as the share price falls in the market.
Answer:
what was the company’s revenue for 2022?
$3802000
Explanation:
Beginning RE + Net Income (Profit or Loss) – Dividends = Ending RE
retained Earnings 928000
begining Equity 1285000
issued 1262000
Pid dividens 242000
928000+profit-3500000-242000=988000
Profit=988000-928000+3500000+242000
Revenue=3802000