Because you could easily contaminate the results of the urine if you don't follow exactly what the strict rules dictate This could be a very dangerous thing because if you contaminate the results, then other doctors would think that the patient has some disease that needs to be taken care of which in reality they do not. The patient could also have to go through things or waste money on things that they don't need to because there was something in the urine that wasn't supposed to be there which was added because they didn't follow the strict rules. Then the doctor who contaminated it could be sued for malpractice which is never a good thing.
Answer:
The correct option is 3
Explanation:
An experimental investigation would require an hypothesis, aim, methodology, results, discussion and conclusion.
The third option can be easily answered using the "requirements" above.
The hypothesis (null hypothesis) would be different types of grass do not affect how far a ball rolls
The aim would be to determine the effect of different types of grass on the movement of a ball
The methodology would involve identifying several playing grounds with different grasses and then rolling the ball with a constant force on the different grasses and then determining the eventual speed and distance traveled by the ball on those grasses which would serve as the results. Inferences can then be made from this results and then conclusions drawn subsequently.
Bone is a type of connective tissue, with specialized cells embedded in a matrix. The matrix of bone consists of ground substance and fibers.
Hope this helps!
I think temprature and the right ph level
