The Consumption schedule shows the relationship of household consumption to the level of disposable income.
<h3>What is disposable income?</h3>
Disposable income is the sum of money that a person or household has available for spending or saving after income taxes have been subtracted (sometimes known as disposable personal income, or DPI). At the macroeconomic level, one of the most important economic indicators used to assess the overall health of the economy is disposable personal income. Net income equals disposable income. It is the balance remaining after taxes. The amount of net income that is left over after covering all essentials is referred to as discretionary income.
You could define disposable income as:
- A country's national income less current transfers (current taxes on wealth, income, and other items, as well as social contributions and other current transfers), plus current transfers that residents of that country can get from the rest of the world.
- Income that individuals or families have available for discretionary spending, is often known as disposable personal (or family/household) income. The amount of money left over after paying for bare needs like shelter, food, and fuel for a family is referred to as disposable income.
To know more about disposable income, visit:
brainly.com/question/14732695
#SPJ4
Climate Change is the first trend that is expected to cause more natural disasters. This has been facilitated by global warming caused by increased green house gases. Food prices are expected to rise due to high temperatures that has affected corn and soybean. Floods and storms are now becoming unpredictable.
There is high control of oil, gas and food prices by financial markets. Commodities traders are now setting prices instead of supply and demand thus the value of dollar in under the control of foreign exchange traders.
Increasing rates of interest, where recently the Federal Reserve wants to increase the Fed fund rates to two percent point. Inflation will be at 2% and unemployment at 4% thus this will show <u>a no falling to recession situation</u> which will allow Fed to keep increasing rates.In the long run cost of loans will rise.
Other trends to notice are;the decline in global economic power of the U.S and the fact that the U.S economy is current in the expansion phase of the business cycle.
Purchasing diverse types of mass media
It is difficult to do this interpretation because there may not have been time for the outcome to have developed. For example, in Venezuela right now there is an attempt by part of the opposition to defeat the government through street violence and reverse the social gains of Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro but the dispute still has not been resolved.
Answer:
b) A free market in tradable permits is typically more efficient that government regulation
Explanation:
- When companies are forced to buy rights to pollute, they are paying a cost for the pollution they create. If they pollute more, they will end paying more for that pollution. (demand of rights to pollute)
- On the other hand, companies that pollute almost nothing can sell rights to pullute saving money: this will create a benefit for companies who take care of environment. (supply of rights to pollute)
- Then, there will be a market of rights to pullute, where some companies will sell and others will buy rights to pullute. In this market, the price of rights to pollute will be determined efficiently.
- Because the production of absolutely every good or service sold in our economy implies pollution, there is a cost society is willing to pay in terms of pollution to get the goods and services it consumes.<em> For example</em>, I am willing to keep buying soda, besides I now for sure its production has certain negative effects on environment. I demand the product, therefore the company (that pollutes) has incentives to keep selling the product.
- The cost we are willing to pay to keep consuming goods will be related to the demand and supply of rights to pollute : companies whose producs are more demanded (by us!) would buy more rights to pollute when neccesary, and companies whose products are not that demanded will buy less rights to pollute, transmiting this results to prices.
- Then, pollution rights became an efficient way of assigning a price to pollution.
