<span>B. would have a hard time managing the land and needed the money for war in Europe. </span>
<span>Joshua is probably a succeeding person at school due to these positive traits:
GENUINENESS -Students with this trait are well linked and trusted .They have many friends and are often looked upon as leaders in their classroom.
GRACIOUSNESS - Students with this trait are popular among their peers and well linked by their teachers.
GRIT - Students with this trait battle through diversity ,stand up for others and are strong minded individuals.</span>
Answer:
D. she blamed his fall on his being clumsy
Explanation:
Fundamental attribution error is a term in social psychology which describes how individual, judges people's actions, by giving too much causal weight to the character of people involved, rather than to the circumstances in which those people acted.
It is often known as correspondence bias or attribution effect.
In other words, it is the defined as the tendency for individual to put much emphasis on dispositional and personality-based explanations on actions of people, while putting less empahsis on situational explanations for actions obeserved from the people's behavior or action.
Hence, in this case, Leila is blaming the man's fall on being clumsy, rather than acknowledging the fact that his fall is due to walking on a patch of ice.
Answer:
The correct answer is D. Judges in a common law system have the power to interpret the common law so that it applies to the unique circumstances of an individual case.
Explanation:
The common law system is based, above all, on the analysis of judicial sentences handed down by the same court or one of its higher courts (those to which decisions made by said court can be appealed) and on the interpretations that in these sentences are given from the laws. This is why the laws can be ambiguous in many respects, as the courts are expected to clarify them (or they have already done so on previous, but similar, laws).
On the other hand, there are judicial interpretations that create new legal figures, which in the beginning was the norm, but today is the exception. However, the nomenclature that recognizes as a statutory offense, for example, the offense created by law, is maintained. At present, it is much more common for laws to create completely new figures or to standardize and set the rules previously established by court sentences.
A very important detail is that, in subsequent cases, the sufficient reason of the sentences previously handed down obliges a court (and all courts below this) to fail to the same way or similarly. This is why the study of the system is based on the detailed analysis of the sentences from which the norm is induced, a study that ends in the elaboration of a "typical case", which is compared with the situation under study to see if it is similar or not. On many occasions, several sentences containing the same principle, viewed from different perspectives, are analyzed to finally extract the rule that will be applied to the case under study.
