<h3><u>
Full question:</u></h3>
Which of the following statements does not represent assumptions that stage theories share?
A. Each stage builds on the knowledge of the previous stage.
B. Each stage corresponds to a specific age.
C. A child can pass through the stages in any order.
D. Each stage is qualitatively different than the next.
<h3><u>
Answer:</u></h3>
A child can pass through the stages in any order not represents assumptions that stage theories share?
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
Stage theory is any postulated construct utilized to illustrate stages or levels in a method that transpires over time, such as an assumption that development comprises spasmodic states qualified by alterations in functioning. Stage theories can be differentiated with continuous theories, which assert that evolution is an incremental means.
The three premises that several stage theories share are:
1) characters pass by stages in a particular order
2) stages are correlated to age.
3) growth is intermittent, with qualitatively distinct roles arising in each stage.
<span>social contagion
This happens when there is the inclination for certain conduct displayed by one individual to be duplicated by other people who are either in the region of the first person who displayed that behaviour . It was initially postulated by Gustave Le Bon in 1895</span>
You could be found in contempt of court if you speak to a reporter about a matter that is now in court in a way that could be interpreted as seeking to sway a jury or potential jurors.
Actions that disobey a court's authority, disrespect a court, or prevent a court from carrying out its duties are all considered to be in contempt of court.
Criminal and civil contempt are the two types of contempt. Criminal contempt of court is frequently defined as conduct that one might typically connect with the term "contempt of court," such as producing a significant disturbance in the courtroom, screaming at the judge, or declining to testify before a grand jury.
When someone disobeys a court order, it most frequently results in civil contempt of court and harm to the rights of a third party. For instance, civil contempt sanctions may be imposed for failure to pay child support as directed by the court. Usually, the aggrieved party, such as a parent who has not received child support payments as per court order, may bring a civil contempt action.
To know more about civil contempt click here,
brainly.com/question/29689260
#SPJ4
Answer:
aa
Explanation:
<u>De facto knowledge:</u>
It is used to describe that is something exist but that is not officially accepted and recognized. It is not the fact, but it is something about the facts. It comes from a Latin phrase that means in reality over as a matter of facts in legal contexts, de facto describes what happens.
<u>Priori knowledge:
</u>
Priori means what is before were used in the philosophy that originally to distinguishes between arguments from the causes and arguments from the effects. Here are arguments of prior said to cause to the effect.
The correct answer is what you had for dinner.
According to Craik and Lockhart's l<span>evels of processing model, we are more likely to remember information that is meaningful, and deeply or thoroughly processed and encoded. In this instance, the food you had with your parents is more likely to be remembered compared to whether you encountered a traffic light and stopped. This is because dinner with loved ones is more meaningful and engages more senses such as visual (how the food looked), olfactory (how it smelled), taste of the food, and touch (the texture of the food). On the other hand, being stopped at a traffic light is not as deeply processed or encoded since it is not very meaningful and does not engage as many senses.</span>
