A. The Internet
This is as the internet has given the average American further ability to participate and influence the political process more easily than in the past. This is primarily due to the presence of social media which has been highly influential in the political process. For example, it is able to influence other people to change their views on political topics or to vote for a certain candidate during a political election.
A voting system that allows voters to cast their vote in secret so that the voter isn't influenced by any other individual, and at the time of voting no one else knows who the voter chose
Answer:
coping
Explanation:
Chris is using his alcohol addiction as a way to cope with lifes problems, much like a cigarette from time to time can relieve stress for some
Ageism and sexism exist in the family as well, while bigotry is coordinated towards individuals outside it. Individuals who you may never meet by any means, contingent upon what nation you and they live in.
Many ladies' suffrage activists were insulted when the fifteenth amendment turned out and the nineteenth amendment hadn't. The way that white men esteemed their own particular spouses short of what they esteemed their slaves. So there unquestionably is the inside the-family viewpoint.
Answer: Stanley Milgram
Explanation: As Stanley Milgram himself stated, the essence of obedience to authority is when a person begins to perceive himself as a tool to fulfil the wishes of the authority, not his own wishes, so he sees all his actions and consequences of these actions as a result of the action of authority, not as a result of his will and responsibility. Milgram based his experiment on the conflict that arises between the state of obedience and the conscience of a person who subordinated to authority. The essence of the experiment concerned the responsibility of those who committed genocide during WWII, who claimed to have been merely obedient, i.e executing the orders of superiors, and based their defense on this claim.
This begs the question of whether or not they were complicit in the genocide.
The experiment was performed with pairs of participants where one was a "student" and the other was a "teacher", and where the student was connected to an electroshock electrode. Each time a student would give a wrong answer, the teacher would activate electricity through the electrodes and the student would experience an electric shock. With each wrong answer, the teacher would increase the level of electric shock. There are also some moderation in the experiment, such as a student would make a mistake on purpose, etc.
The conclusion is that ordinary people are generally willing to kill people, even if they are innocent in order to execute the orders of superiors, recognised as authority. It is considered that when it comes to authority, all its orders are justified and legal. So it is moral and proper to follow the orders of authority, whatever it may be.
