Answer: Racism is a problem in Colombia and everywhere else and the problem is people choosing to to except others for their skin color, race, religious belief, or ethnicity
Explanation:
Answer:
I think its 75000 + 75000
Explanation:
because 75000 is on and i search web
Answer:
A major goal of the <u><em>ecological</em></u> approach to perception is to determine how movement creates perceptual information that both guides further movement and helps observers perceive the environment.
Explanation:
The Ecological Approach is an attempt to understand how the natural factors affect living beings, how living beings interact with these elements and what would be the consequences of it. Then based on this analysis and the results, what path must be taken.
An aircraft is usually granted the right-of-way when they are in distress
<h3>What is Right-of-Way?</h3>
This refers to the legal right that a vehicle or aircraft has to pass a route that is a territory of another. This is usually done when there is distress on the part of an aircraft.
Furthermore, some air crafts that have right-of-way over others are:
Hence, we can see that your question is incomplete so I gave you a general overview to help you get a better understanding of the concept.
Read more about right-of-way here:
brainly.com/question/13393277
#SPJ11
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
