This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Although the leaders of two enemy nations admit to a buildup of their own military forces, each sees the other country's actions as unreasonable and motivated by evil intentions. This situation best illustrates:
the mere exposure effect.
the just-world phenomenon.
mirror-image perceptions.
deindividuation.
social facilitation.
None of the listed answers are correct
Answer:
This situation best illustrates mirror-image perceptions.
Explanation:
The term mirror-image perception refers to the human tendency of viewing others as the enemy, as evil, especially in a situation of conflict. It is called mirror-image because both people or sides involved in the conflict see themselves as good, and the other as the villain. That is precisely the case described in the passage. Both leaders do not see a problem concerning their own buildup of their military forces - they "know" they are doing it for good reasons. But both of them also think that the other leader doing it is a sign of evil intentions on his part.
I'm going to say the oddysey? I'm probably wrong and I know that but maybe that will give you a hint?
Answer:
pls explain frother there is no chart
Explanation:
If the words "positive" and "negative" here refer to whether propaganda aims to create a positive or negative image, then the answer is :"True".
For example, in Socialist Countries in 1970s a big portion of propaganda was positive, aiming at convincing the citizens that socialism is good for the country. <span />
Answer:
hubo muchos muertos estubo por comenzar la 3 guerra
