Generalizing from research, we can predict that the presence of others will INCREASE performance on well-learned tasks and DECREASE <span>performance on novel or challenging tasks.
in doing we're doing a well-learned task, our brain could complete it with less focus, so having the presence of others will give no trouble to our task.
But, in challenging tasks, our brain need more focus to complete it, so the presence of others will be more likely to cause nervousness that lead to a decrease in performance</span>
Answer:
Katherine's opportunity cost is the cost of getting to the lecture event itself plus the reduction in her physics exam grade by not studying tonight. True
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the cost of foregoing a benefit or incurring loss due to opting an alternative which is next beneficial . Here Katherine is losing in terms of grades in her exam to take the benefit of listening to the lecture , So loss to her grade is the opportunity cost of attending to the lecture and getting benefited.
Answer:
I would be a Federalist.
Explanation:
the main difference between the federalist and anti-federalists is on their opinion on how much power the central government should have over the states.
Federalist wanted the government to have more power and the anti-federalist wanted the government to have less power. In Hindsight, anti-federalists' idea sounds better. Since it will give the government less influence to disrupt the people.
But considering the issues that they faced at the time, I believe more government power was necessary.
The earlier draft of the constitution did not provide the central government with crucial power such as ability to collect taxes or create a centralized military. Both of those issues were supported by the Federalist.
