Answer:
The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed in most states is false.
Explanation:
Contributory negligence is a doctrine of common law that if a person was injured in part due to his/her own negligence, that is his/her negligence contributed to the accident, the injured party would not be entitled to collect any damages (money) from another party who supposedly caused the accident.
And historically, contributory negligence was the rule in all states, leading to harsh results. Many states now developed and adopted comparative negligence laws. Today, the jurisdictions that still use contributory negligence are few.
Answer:
When you hit the breaks like that you are creating friction so that is what make your bike tires hot and the road look like that.
Explanation:
Answer:
One of the most common reasons that eminent domain cases are brought to court is over disputes about just compensation. The takings clause in the United States Constitution that established the government's power of eminent domain states
1. Is administrator
2 a power of attorney
3. I THINK it is his or her spouse
4 if all beneficiaries consent to the trusts termination
5 holographic will
6 health care proxy
7 testamentary trust
8 intestate
9 trustee
10 beneficiaries