This technique is known as Foot-in-the-door phenomenon.
Foot-in-the-door phenomenon is a way of having a person to furnish or follow a big request with the aid of using to begin with making small or modest requests.
The approach is primarily based totally at the good judgment that if a respondent (the individual being requested) can furnish an preliminary small or modest request, then the respondent might be maximum probable to later furnish a bigger request that he/she (the respondent) might now no longer have granted if requested outright (with out being approached with small requests first).
To learn more about foot-in-the-door phenomenon, click here:
brainly.com/question/15745551
#SPJ4
Answer:
A good place for reviewers to start is with:
<u>A. an analysis of the work's context</u>.
Explanation:
The work of a reviewer can become really strenuous when the work is too extensive or complex, so an ideal first step is to do a context analysis, that is, not to focus directly on the object of the work but <u>everything that led to its creation, as its historical, social, political or academic base, and all that it would involve, which can give you a general idea of the work,</u> which you will surely use later as prior knowledge to objectively analyze the works without making mistakes like misinterpretations.
Answer:
Research is an essential component of psychology and it is important psychologists conduct research. It gives them the ability to understand and describe various behavior mechanisms. Research done by psychologists is conducted to be able to study human emotions and our actions.
The closer one, of course. The information propagated to you no faster than the speed of light, so assuming the information was conveyed visually -- you saw something happen -- you would see the closer event first. The answer to your question is B. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
