There are different kinds of rules. A commonly used test in a disparate impact case is the four-fifths rule which bases potential discrimination of a minority group relative to organization's hiring rate to be less than four-fifths of the hiring rate for the majority group.
<h3>What is the four-fifths rule?</h3>
There has been evidence of some discrimination if an organization's hiring rate for a minority group is said to be less than four-fifths of the hiring rate for the majority group.
The 4/5ths Rule is known to be a rule of thumb under which looks at the selection rate for any race, or ethnic group and has found it to be less than four-fifths (4/5th) or eighty percent (80%) of the known selection rate for the said group with the biggest selection rate.
Learn more about four-fifths rule from
brainly.com/question/6111641
I'd probably lean towards "installment plan". As the number of stores grew across the nation and more products became available, they began looking at different ways to get people to buy more even if they didn't have all of the cash at the moment. So as one store offered up an installment plan to help pay off that new car, fridge, or whatever, other stores were forced to compete allowing more people to get even more stuff. It's a tricky question because there were also early credit cards available at the this point in time, but installment plans are based on roughly the same concept - allowing people to buy on credit with a promise to pay everything off at a later date. As I see it, though, instead of having to sign up for a specific card you could walk into any store with an installment plan and get what you wanted
That would be dissociative identity disorder
Catholicism was still dominant in Europe. There were many Calvinist centers in France. Most people in Norway were Catholic. England and Scotland had the most Muslim centers.
