If the force were constant or increasing, we could guess that the speed of the sardines is increasing. Since the force is decreasing but staying in contact with the can, we know that the can is slowing down, so there must be friction involved.
Work is the integral of (force x distance) over the distance, which is just the area under the distance/force graph.
The integral of exp(-8x) dx that we need is (-1/8)exp(-8x) evaluated from 0.47 to 1.20 .
I get 0.00291 of a Joule ... seems like a very suspicious solution, but for an exponential integral at a cost of 5 measly points, what can you expect.
On the other hand, it's not really too unreasonable. The force is only 0.023 Newton at the beginning, and 0.000067 newton at the end, and the distance is only about 0.7 meter, so there certainly isn't a lot of work going on.
The main question we're left with after all of this is: Why sardines ? ?
Straight
You already have to momentum of walking forward, and going back and forth are the same distance. If you go back then you would have to stop, turn and walk, but if you go forward you just have to walk.
Answer:
a) Directamente proporcional
Explanation:
El peso se puede definir como la fuerza que actúa sobre un cuerpo o un objeto como resultado de la gravedad.
Matemáticamente, el peso de un objeto viene dado por la fórmula;
Donde;
m es la masa del objeto.
g es la aceleración debida a la gravedad.
De la expresión matemática, podemos deducir que el valor del peso de un objeto es directamente proporcional a la masa del objeto.
Por lo tanto, un aumento en la masa de un objeto provocaría un aumento en el peso del objeto y viceversa.
Same as the other person most likely would be 20 times louder as your answer
