Answer:
Karl Marx and Max Weber were two German sociologists who wrote extensively about social stratification in modern capitalist societies. However, their methods and conclusions were very different. Marx saw class struggle as the most important factor, while Weber rejected Marx's ideas and had a more nuanced approach to social stratification.
Explanation:
For Karl Marx, social stratification was a consequence of the division of society in social classes. These classes are divided by their relationship to the means of production. In other words, by the place they occupy in the economy. Marx argued that there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie, which sits above the rest of society because they own the means of production, and the proletariat, who own no means of production and must sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order to make a living. In short, whether one owns or not the material means of life is the most important factor in social stratification.
Max Weber, on the other hand, considered Marx's explanation lacking. He considered that social stratification went beyond who owned the means of production, and considered that there are three dimensions to social class which determine one's place in society: power, which means how much one is able to influence the behaviour of others; economic inequality, which refers to how much wealth one owns with respect to others; and social status, which is a more diffuse understanding of how one's own worth is perceived by others. Weber considered that these three dimensions together better explained social stratification than relations of production alone.
Given what has been said, we can note two key differences between Marx and Weber. Marx was a materialist philosopher, in the sense that for him material differences were the primary factor, while social and psychological factors were determined by the material factor. For Weber, the material factor was only one of many, and certainly not the most important. This leads to the second difference. Marx considered that class struggle, the conflict between the owning class and the working classes, was the driving force of history. Weber on the other hand, saw class struggle as more diluted and nowere as crucial and important as Marx saw it.
Answer:
Dispute resolution at initial level injects a sense of security and belief in an individual and hence improves the relationship between the two
Explanation:
The internal conflicts between the people and institution if resolved at an earlier stage build confidence in people working in the institution. They also start respecting the institution and start believing that their voices are also heard irrespective of their post.
This also brings clarity in relation and expectations both at the institution and individual level. Once a strong bond develops through this exercise of dispute resolution at initial level, the relation between institution and people become co-ordial.
Answer:
C. They are uniquely constructed and constantly reshaped.
<span>The answer is two. It
was started in the 1970s where the Chinese government enacted. This was due to the continuation of the
Cultural Revolution and the pressure it put the nation through. Though there
have been reports in 2015 that the government may have made changes in these
laws due to the aging problem in China. The new laws were approved in session on
December 27, 2015 and became effective on January 1, 2016.</span>
