Answer:
Incomplete question
Complete question:
A society that puts equality—in the sense of equality of outcome—ahead of freedom will
end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom, and the force, introduced for good purposes, will end up in the hands of people who use it to promote their own interests. On the other hand, a society that puts freedom first will, as a happy by-product, end up with both greater freedom and greater equality. A free society releases the energies and abilities of people to pursue their own objectives. It prevents some people from arbitrarily suppressing others. It does not prevent people from achieving positions of privilege, but so long as freedom is maintained, it prevents those positions of privilege from becoming institutionalized.
—Milton Friedman, Free to Choose (1980)
Which of the following governmental policies would the author most likely support?
a) Restricting individuals from carrying guns in public.
b) Allowing individuals to purchase marijuana for recreational use.
c) Requiring individuals traveling in cars to wear seat belts.
d) Establishing minimun age requirements to access adult social media sites.
Answer: b) Allowing individuals to purchase marijuana for recreational use
Explanation:
The author is most likely to support the Government in allowing individuals to purchase marijuana for recreational purposes because he was very much emphatic about the freedom of individuals to do what makes them happy.
There is a possibility that trump will win the 2016 election and then he will become the 45th presid
Answer:
Warren, is the right answer.
Explanation:
The period in the history of the United States when Earl Warren served as the Chief Justice of the U.S. came to be recognized as the Warren Court. He succeeded Fred M. Vinson in the year 1953 and worked on the post until 1969. This period is recognized as one of the most impactful periods in the history of American constitutional law. The Warren Court enhanced the power of the judiciary and the federal government as well as the civil rights and civil liberties.
<span>a libertarian
I hope this helps:)</span>
The answer to this question is D. <span>Taking up arms to defend the nation
Basically, any reason could be used to take arms and protect our own nations from a potential enemy.
Even if the reason is considered as 'sick' or 'evil' if it's spoken out loud during this time (such as i want to see all of the people from enemy's nation died and suffer)</span>
