All categories

1 year ago

the right to a lawyer in texas for those who cannot afford one is most often handled in criminal cases by. quizlet

1 answer:

8 0

The right to a lawyer in Texas for those who cannot afford one is most often handled in criminal cases by free legal counsel from lawyers in the community or reimbursement of local lawyers.

Legal counsel is a person or business that provides advisory services on a variety of topics, especially legal situations including negotiations. The terms "legal counsel" and "lawyer" are frequently used synonymously.

The role of a legal counsel is that of a general attorney who works for the corporation and is not an independent contractor. To ensure that rules are followed, they collaborate with management and staff members inside their company. Additionally, a Business Attorney who manages all corporate legal procedures collaborates closely with them.

Learn more about legal counsel here:

brainly.com/question/28157146

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Design an experiment to test whether drinking alcohol influences people's tendency to become socially aggressive. Be sure to spe

Ber [7]

Answer:

1. Drinking alcohol influences people's tendency to become socially aggressive?

2. Experimental hypothesis:

In this experiment, if teenagers between 16 to 19, drink 100% agave tequila, then they become socially aggresive.

Dependent variable: social aggresiveness.

Independent variable: 100% agave tequila consumption.

Explanation:

Experimental conditions: these group members will consume alcohol at specified given conditions.

Control conditions: these group members will not consume alcohol.

The participants in this experiment are 16 teenagers aged from 16 to 19, 8 teenagers will be allowed to drink 100% agave tequila, and 8 teenagers will be the control group.

All teenagers participants belong to four mexican related families which will represent the experiment´s group.

Group # 1: Sanchez family with 4 participants aged 16 and 19 year old teenagers will be in the experimental group and the 17 and 18 year old ones, in the control group.

Group # 2: Gutierrez family with 3 participants aged 16 year old twins in the control and one 19 year old in the experimental group.

Group # 3: Lopez family with 5 participants, 16, 17 and 19 year old in experimental group and 18 year old twins in the control group.

Group # 4: Santillan family with 4 participants, the 16 and 18 year old will be in the control group and the 17 and 19 will be in the experimental group.

Experimental procedures to help ensure the reliability of the research.

The participants are to be observed during four different family parties thrown by each family participating on four different dates for interaction and social aggressiveness when consuming alcohol. In the Sanchez´ family party and first observation the teenagers drink 4, 6 oz. 100% agave tequila "caballitos" for them to drink in a one hour time frame.

In the Gutierrez´ party´s observation the participants are to drink 5, 6 oz 100% agave tequila "caballitos" within one hour time frame.

In the Lopez´ party´s observation the participants are to drink 6, 6 oz 100% agave tequila "caballitos" within one hour time frame.

In the Santillan´s party´s observation the participants are to drink 7, 6 oz 100% agave tequila "caballitos" within one hour time frame.

Hypothesis: The teenagers in the experimental group will develop increasing social aggressiveness within their alcohol consumption.

Conclusion: the 4 mexican families are now enemies as all their teenagers in the experimental group became aggressive after drinking 100% agave tequila and ended up fighting with each other in each party.

8 0

3 years ago

Law and order helps to structure the economy by providing

Yuri [45]

a justice system in the awnswer

4 0

3 years ago

What resort city is located on the baja california peninsula?.

kakasveta [241]

Answer:

Cabo San Lucas

Explanation:

 ThankYou

Please mark me as brainliest

7 0

2 years ago

In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. University of Texas at Austin case that ________.

viva [34]

In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.

<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>

In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.

To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326

#SPJ4

3 0

2 years ago

You read about a proposed amendment to require all students to remain in high school until they are stile to

Liono4ka [1.6K]

Answer:

C) It will not pass because most proposed amendments do not pass.

Explanation:

It is very hard to pass an amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The US Constitution states that an amendment can be proposed by the Congress or by a Constitutional convention called for two-thirds of the states legislatures. But the last option has never been used. Just the first one, when two-thirds of the Congress has a majority vote.

This means in the Senate and in the House of Representatives. And an amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of the states, this means, 38 of the 50 states. Then, an amendment becomes part of the Constitution.

8 0

3 years ago