Sure. From those choices, the only one that makes sense is that he
didn't perform enough trials. Technically, you can't expect the experimental
probability to match the theoretical probability until you've rolled it an infinite
number of times.
I have a hunch that even for only 60 trials, such a great discrepancy between
theory and experiment is beginning to suggest that the cubie is loaded. But
you really can't say. You just have to keep trying and watch how the numbers
add up.
The factors is just 1 and 23. The array should be 23 rows/columns of just 1 dot only. Here's an example:
Factors of 5: 1 and 5
Array: •••••
The sum of all interior angles in a triangle is 180°.
m∠q + m∠r + m∠s = 180°
1x + 3x + 6x = 180
10x = 180
x = 180/10
x = 18
m∠q = (1x)° = 1 x 18 = 18°
m∠ r = (3x)° = 3 x 18 = 54°
m∠s = (6x)° = 6 x 18 = 108°
m∠s is the obtuse angle because its measure is more than 90°. Its angle measures 108°
Answer:
26.50
Step-by-step explanation:
First we need to calculate the sales tax
25 * 6%
Changing to decimal from
25 * .06
1.50
Then we add the tax to the cost of the shirt
25+1.50
26.50
We owe 26.50
Answer:
1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Dividing the amount of boys (6) by the amount of students (10), and then reiterating that, subtracting 1 from both, you get:
(6/10) x (5/9) which equals a third.
