Nathanson claims that a great benefit of abolishing the death penalty would be that:_________

1 answer:

jeka942 years ago

5 0

Nathanson claims that a great benefit of abolishing the death penalty would be that this would send a symbolic message that killing is not acceptable except in self-defense.

Self-defense is a measure to protect one's health and well-being from harm. Many jurisdictions allow the exercise of the right of self-defense as a legal justification for the use of force in times of danger.

To use force to protect oneself from attempts to harm another person. If justified, self-defense is the defense against various crimes and unlawful acts involving violence such as murder, assault, and assault. criminal law.

Whether or not you have a pistol or other personal protective equipment, the goal of self-defense is to survive without injury and escape by deterring or stopping aggressive behavior.

Learn more about self-defense here:brainly.com/question/20714799
#SPJ4

You might be interested in

- Contrast How do socialism and communism differ?

kirill115 [55]

Answer:

Socialism-a social and political philosophy based on the belief that democratic means should be used to evenly distribute wealth throughout a society

Communism-a political system characterized by a centrally planned economy will all economic and political power resting in the hands of the central government.

3 0

4 years ago

Five-year-old matthew and 6-year-old jessica like to pretend that they live or work in a zoo. often, matthew will pretend to be

8_murik_8 [283]

Answer= C. SOCIODRAMATIC PLAY

Dramatic play can be defined as a type of play were children accept and assign roles and then act them out. Children imitate actions and speech from earlier observed situations. They pretend to be someone or something different from themselves, and dramatize situations and actions to go along with the rolls the chose to play.

When another person becomes involved in the play, it is called Sociodramatic play.

8 0

3 years ago

On a series of coin tosses, Oleg has correctly predicted heads or tails seven times in a row. In this instance, we can reasonabl

Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

a random & coincidental occurrence

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Oleg's predictive accuracy can be attributed as being a random & coincidental occurrence. This is mainly due to the fact that making this prediction correctly 7 times in a row has extremely low odds of happening and those odds keep getting worse the more times he tosses the coin.

6 0

3 years ago

Jeremy told a friend that studying for his calculus test is useless because the test questions are so unrelated to course work.

timurjin [86]

The answer is: External locus of control

People who believe in external locus of control, tend to think that all circumstances that happen in their life happen because of outside factors that they cannot control.

In many circumstances, this would lead to the behavior displayed by Jeremy. Rather than actually making an effort to fix his course score, he decided to do nothing at all because he believe it's outside his control.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why is funding from the federal government excluded from Georgia’s revenue?

KonstantinChe [14]

Answer:

The answer is B.

Explanation:

I know this because, i just took the test so the answer is B (Georgia is unable to allocate the money as it wants.)

8 0

3 years ago