Critique Olivera's approach on leading the turnaround process because of overconfidence and unrealistic expectation.
<h3>
Critique Olivera's approach on leading the turnaround process?</h3>
Olivera's strategy for managing the turnaround process wasn't very successful. Considering his prior success as an MT, he was overconfident. He had brilliant ideas and was skilled at analyzing the issues that the organization was experiencing inside.
However, he attempted to force such concepts on the four supervisors without first seeking his approval. When he proposed new plans or a change to the way they were functioning, the supervisors resisted because they had considerably more work experience than he did. It is normal to feel in charge when someone new appears out of nowhere and criticizes how things are being done. As a result, the supervisors disapproved of this change strategy.
<h3>
what would you have done differently?</h3>
An organization's goal is frequently to improve when it decides to launch a transformation program. I would have taken a variety of other actions if I were him. I would get to know the staff members better and develop a close personal bond with them during the first few months. Planning a lunch, a supper, or an expedition will help the team bond better. After that, I would visit with each department to discuss any problems they may be having or problems they think are hurting the company's sales.
After that, I would assess whether my observations matched up with the actual issues that employees believed the company was experiencing. Instead of making all the decisions at once, I would solicit the supervisors' opinions on the issues or areas they believe may be improved before providing my own perspective. In order to bring about change, I would advise the supervisor to explore each potential option one at a time without rushing.
Learn more about transformation program: brainly.com/question/10411144
#SPJ4
Theyre chosen by the state
Answer:
The answer is Kulaks
Explanation:
The term Kulak referred to peasants who owned more than 8 acres of land and were considered “hesitating allies” of the revolution. In the 1930s, with Joseph Stalin in control of the Soviet Union, kulaks were decimated; peasants who became wealthier from 1906 to 1914 thanks to the <em>Stolypin Reform</em> were targeted as kulaks, <u>but also anyone who withheld grain from the Bolsheviks</u>. From 1929 to 1932 the dekulakization consisted on the arrest, deportation and execution of millions of prosperous peasants in order to seize their lands as part of Stalin’s first five years plan on the attempt to create new policies centred on a rapid industrialization and collectivization of agriculture (aimed to integrate individual landholdings and labour into collectively-controlled and state-controlled farms).
A person who has Wernicke's aphasia is someone who has a communication disorder that is inability to understand the meaning of spoken words and sentences
A person who has Wernicke's aphasia is someone who has a communication disorder and such person is characterized by the following communication features:
negatively impacted communication abilities:
- Reading abilities
- Writing abilities
preserved communication abilities:
- intellectual abilities
- cognitive capabilities
Therefore, a person who has Wernicke's aphasia is someone who has a communication disorder that is inability to understand the meaning of spoken words and sentences
