The RR technique or the Randomized Response can be used to help ensure that individuals answer sensitive or self-incriminating questions honestly. It is developed by Warner (1965), which aims to eliminate or at least minimize non-response and dishonest answering by survey respondents. This is accomplished by separating the response from the respondent by introducing a controlled measure of chance or uncertainty, which amounts to randomization of the answering process. This protects the identity of the respondents, at the cost of introducing a degree of uncertainty into the responses.
Answer:
Stress hormones at the time of learning __<em>interferes</em>___ new memory formation; the presence of stress hormones at the time of recall _<em>impairs</em>____ retrieval of older memories.
Explanation:
When stressed, the human body produces some stress hormone. Some of these hormones can affect certain parts of the brain, interfering with the encoding of new memory, and inhibiting the recall of long term or older memories. An example of a stress hormone responsible for negatively affecting long-term, delayed recall memory is the cortisol, and the effect is usually felt at the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex and the amygdala.
Answer:
D. Harvard "Tastes, Ties, and Time (t-3)" study (2006-2009)" study
Explanation:
In 2006, Harvard conduct a (t-3) study that gains popularity. It was a Face-book study that plays with your emotions. This study doesn't share the mood manipulation which unsettled many of the users. It is a good example of social data is always murky and study themselves is completely creepy. In this study, the researcher collects the data without informed consent of objects throughout the data verse network.
1. B Deprived children
2. C The right to against stelf-inscrimination
This is an example of C. importance of political knowledge.
These people didn't know enough about politics and the politicians they were voting for which is evident based on this question. They favored some politicians because they were gullible and didn't understand that favoring them won't really give them any benefits. If they had more knowledge, they would probably have voted for a better candidate.
