The Berlin Conference<span> of 1884–85, also known as the </span>Congo Conference<span> (</span>German<span>: </span>Kongokonferenz<span>) or </span>West Africa Conference<span> (</span>Westafrika-Konferenz),[1]<span>regulated </span>European colonization<span> and trade in </span>Africa<span> during the </span>New Imperialism<span> period, and coincided with Germany's sudden emergence as an imperial power. Called for by </span>Portugal<span> and organized by </span>Otto von Bismarck<span>, first </span>Chancellor of Germany<span>, its outcome, the </span>General Act of the Berlin Conference<span>, can be seen as the formalization of the </span>Scramble for Africa<span>. The conference ushered in a period of heightened colonial activity by European powers, which eliminated or overrode most existing forms of African </span>autonomy<span> and self-governance.</span><span>[2]</span>
Answer: Answers are bolded below
Explanation: 1. Bolivia DID NOT waive its immunity
2. Bolivia DID NOT commit tort in the United States
3. There is NO EVIDENCE to indicate that Bolivia violated any international laws as it is a business transaction with a private entity
4. Bolivia entered into the agreement in THE UNITED STATES, and the failure to pay has DIRECT commercial effect on the United States because the customized golf balls are not likely to be sold in the United States, costing the Lozas significant loss
5. The Lozas CAN sue Bolivia in a U. S. court as this is a private business transaction involving a breach of contract and not in international courts of law as no international laws have been broken.
False is the correct answer i think sorry if i’m wrong