Because the united states believed that it was its well... "destiny" to go out in the world or at least west, and take what ever land was there, as the united states was the great liberator for the people who wanted to be free- so it was its destiny to grow its borders, anyways, this made adapting new states into the union almost policy and the united states was eager to add more land and territory to its borders.
Because at the time, it was much more dangerous for people not to bear arms and be defenseless. If you could protect yourself at the time, it was much easier for you to surive in the hard times that people were living in at the time. This is, of course, much different today and the same laws aren't necessarily applicable.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Supreme Court Justice Holmes once included this statement in a majority opinion: "During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished." This statement informed the Supreme Court's later decisions on freedom of speech in that in times of war, citizens are not allowed to express comments or critics that could compromise the national security of the country. So in this case, freedom of speech could be suppressed during the time of war.
In the past, there had been incidents that could have compromised the strategy of the war due to some espionage activities. That is why the federal government has to be cautious with the information that is shared during war times.
Answer: barbershops :) it is online :) plz mark me brainlyist!! :)
Explanation:
online
