Answer:
The answer is letter A.
Explanation:
The true statement is Annual data on the distribution of income will indicate that the degree of income inequality in the two cities is identical.
I would say C. Hope this helps!
Answer:
The correct answer is
: Yes, the offer was revoked by Katherine.
Explanation:
Even if Paul replied Katherine with the acceptance to the first offer, he used a different means of communication to do that -<em>e-mail v. mail</em>. In addition, Katherine sent the revoke by mail -<em>as in the initial offer</em>- before Paul sent his e-mail. So, there is enough proof on Katherine's end that she didn't want to proceed with the offer before Paul confirmed his agreement on the terms. In that sense, Katherine did revoke the initial order.
Answer:
fraudulent misrepresentation
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that this case best represents an example of fraudulent misrepresentation. This term refers to a civil tort that has come out of contract law, in which a false statement has cased the individual to enter into a contract. Therefore misrepresenting the details of the contract in order to persuade the individual to agree to it.