1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oxana [17]
1 year ago
10

Can the evidence seen when initially entering the house be used in court as evidence of his guilt?

Law
1 answer:
zubka84 [21]1 year ago
4 0

Yes, The evidence discovered upon first entering the house may be utilized in court to prove his guilt.

<h3>Which or which kind of evidence are not allowed in court?</h3>

Anything that violates the law or the rules of the court is not admissible evidence. For instance, hearsay evidence or evidence collected illegally is not admissible. Additionally, it might not be accepted if information is not directly related to the dispute. Evidence that is detrimental may also render it inadmissible in court.

<h3>What two conditions must be met before a piece of evidence can be used in court?</h3>

Criminal cases (a) (1) The defendant may demonstrate that the moral quality at issue in the alleged conduct is consistent with his or her decent moral character. (2) The prosecution may not establish the defendant's bad moral character as it relates to the moral characteristic at issue in the alleged offense, unless in rebuttal.

To know more about admissible evidence, visit:

brainly.com/question/29550883

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
This person may bring a lawsuit for damaged or the enforcement of an agreement
kifflom [539]
I think the answer is A. Defendant
5 0
3 years ago
The term “corrections” was introduced to describe prisons in what decade?
Lelu [443]
1950s it’s when it was introduced
4 0
3 years ago
What can robots do that humans cannot do?
Fynjy0 [20]

Robots can know things instantly as humans can not we at least think about it for 1-90 seconds before we come up with with our answer same as I had to do for yours.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jenson is a private security officer who works at the door of a club which is sanctioned to only allow individuals who are 21 an
sweet-ann [11.9K]

Answer:

unethical

1. if they are allowing individuals under the age of 21 in they need to have a stamp or a badge that has to be visable or they will be kicked out.

2 the individuals that are the age or above 21 should have a different badge that indicates that they are the age of or above 21 and must be visible or they will get kicked out.

3 if they are allowing underage individuals in they must have people watching them so they don't sneak alcoholic beverages.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Beavis, while walking down the street, notices a house with no lights on. Having a fascination with fire, Beavis takes a lighter
BaLLatris [955]

Explanation:

I don't know why don't you answer it yourself

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What should you do if you come in close contact during apprehension?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the burden of proof in a criminal case?
    12·1 answer
  • True/False: Bandwagon was given as an example of a popular type of appeal and a link with fallacy, a flaw in reasoning. This is
    14·2 answers
  • Ms. Lewis understands that Medicare prescription drug plans may use various methods to control the use of specific drugs. She ha
    9·2 answers
  • Me ayudan porfavor!!
    10·1 answer
  • Based on the facts of the previous question, Jay stays in the hospital for a few days as he is recuperating. Then, a couple of w
    12·1 answer
  • If driving under the influence leads to a fatal collision, the driver could be charged
    10·2 answers
  • Why do you think people shoplift? list the reasons
    9·1 answer
  • Why is aura lee good for begginers.
    12·2 answers
  • One of the legal definitions of intoxication in texas
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!