Through social media and connecting with others! Like here:)
<span>This is false. Concepts of reasoning and belief (as brought about by being taught about these ideas by elders and other authority figures) are hugely linked to how messages are seen and interpreted. Two cultures that put importance on completely different ideas can take the same message and interpret it as a friendly notion or a grave threat.</span>
<u>Answer:</u>
African socialism advocated by African leaders was part and parcil of marxism is false.
<u>Explanation</u>:
- African socialism that was advocated by the African leaders of the time, is in every way and in all of its variations different from the pointers and properties of Marxism.
- Thus, making African Socialism not a part or a parcel of the Marxism ideology.
- This is so, as due to the presence of tribes and its social background makes socialism come as a natural for Africa, all the while excluding the chance or possibility of the theory of class struggle due to the tribal structure of Africa, making it absolutely different from Marxism and the European Socialist theories.
Research by Gould and his colleagues on fixing detailed plans as some way to extend confidence showed that <u>elite athletes had the foremost detailed plans. </u>
Research by Gould and his colleagues on elite athletes are concreted by two factors, Self-efficacy and self-confidence.
The coach’s efficacy expectations of the athlete or team can also play a task in determining the efficacy beliefs of their athletes. When US Olympic athletes were asked to list the foremost effective coaching actions to spice up athletes’ performance, providing support and confidence were ranked second (Gould et al., 1999). Chase, Lirgg, and Feltz (1997) specifically examined the connection between coaches’ efficacy for his or her teams and team performance. Coaches of 4 intercollegiate women’s basketball teams were queried before their games on their confidence in their teams’ abilities to perform specific basketball skills (i.e., shoot field goals and free throws, rebound, commit turnovers, etc.). Coaches were also told to look at the speed of importance they placed on these skills, the perceived control they felt over the end result, and opponent ability.
The above explanation justified our answer and provides detailed understanding.
Learn more about, Self-efficacy
brainly.com/question/10575222
#SPJ4
