In a research study designed to test the effects of alcohol on sociability, neither the participants nor the investigator are aware of who receives alcohol and who does not. this is an example of: the double blind technique.
<h3>What is the double blind technique?</h3>
This is the term that is used in experiments to refer to the existing situation where the people carrying out the experiments and the ones that are participants do not know the particular person that is receiving a given treatment,
Hence we have to say that based on the fact that the participants and and the investigator do not know the groups that are taking the the alcohol and who does not, it is a double blind study.
Read more on double blind technique here: brainly.com/question/23389356
#SPJ1
Answer:
C)caffeine is the independent variable
Explanation:
Caffeine is the independent variable and word recall is the dependent variable. Word recall is dependent on the presence or absence of caffeine.
According to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, the right of Freedom of Association confers citizens the authority to belong to interest Groups.
<h3>The First Amendment.</h3>
The First Amendment to the US constitution guarantees the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference.
The first amendment outlaws any national religion, impede the free exercise of religion, guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
Learn more about the First Amendments at brainly.com/question/2206011
#SPJ1
A written language is one component of what scholars called a CIVILIZATION.
Civilization refers to the stage of human social development which is considered as very advanced. There are eight major elements of civilization and they are: Art, culture, religion, technology, trade/transportation, government, economy and written language.<span />
Answer: ethical lapse
Explanation:
An ethical lapse is an error or mistake in judgement that an individual commits which brings about a harmful outcome. It is usually as a result of an oversight as it really doesn't mean that the individual lacks integrity.
The scenario in the question is an ethical lapse. This is because the extra $25 she pocketed wasn't accounted for as it was an oversight and it wasn't that she intentionally stole the $25 or didn't account for it intentionally.