Answer:
I think he can not . I believe that it has nothing to do that if for example Bailey had a car insurance with Progressive, which means it is supposed to provide additional insurance when they are injured by someone who does not have adequate insurance to cover the full damages. Bailey was negligent In the car accident. Bailey had failed to apply his brakes in time to avoid the collision, failed to turn his vehicle to avoid the collision, failed to keep his vehicle under control, and was inattentive to his surroundings.
Explanation:
Answer:
Article V of the Constitution provides two ways to propose amendments to the document. Amendments may be proposed either by the Congress, through a joint resolution passed by a two-thirds vote, or by a convention called by Congress in response to applications from two-thirds of the state legislatures.
Explanation:
Answer:
option a is the correct option
Answer:
Yes <em>and</em> no.
Patrick <em>would</em> be liable for negligence in <em>allowing</em> the hail damage, as he <em>failed</em> to fulfill his duty of taking reasonable care of the vehicle.
However, he would<em> not</em> be responsible for the hot oil and gravel nicks.
Answer:
Well I think that they are good people. Unless you're talking about the ones who explode.
Explanation:
