All categories

1 year ago

a secured party who has control will prevail over a secured party who has only filed for these types of collateral:

Business

1 answer:

marshall27 [118]1 year ago

5 0

Deposit accounts, Investment Property, and Letter-of-credit Rights. Thus option (A) is correct

<h3>What is the investment?</h3>

Investment is the ceremonial of money to purchase an asset to attain an increase in value over a time period of time. Investment requires a sacrifice of some present quality, such as time, medium of exchange, or effort. In finance, the purpose of investing is to generate a return from the invested asset.

Whether or not there is a current obligation to be secured, a person who has the benefit of the security interest generated by or provided for under a security arrangement is known as a secured party under UCC law. when the secured party is in possession, a duty of care.] A secured party must take reasonable care to keep the collateral it has in its possession safe unless subsection (d) provides otherwise.

Therefore, Thus option(A) is correct

Learn more about investments here:

brainly.com/question/15353704

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

"I promise to pay $5,000 to Lorenzo on or before August 1, 2001, in return for the same amount borrowed from him on May 1, 2001.

solong [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that in this circumstance the note is not negotiable because the note states the reason for the debt. Since the reason it stated it proves as to why the money needs to be paid to the individual and must therefore be paid in full on the date that has been listed.

5 0

2 years ago

If washburn guitars were to lower the price of the maya pro dd75 to $2,499 from $2,699, sales of the guitar would increase 30 pe

inn [45]

The Washburn guitars reduces their price from $2,499 to $2,699 as a result of the sales of the product drastically increased by 30%, So this represents that the <u>product has an elastic demand.</u>

<h3>What do you mean by elastic demand?</h3>

When the price of a product has a massive effect on the quantity purchased is called Elastic demand. A product is stated to have an elastic demand if sales drop sharply in reaction to a growth in price, or sales spike whilst prices are decreased.

Thus, The Washburn guitars reduces their price from $2,499 to $2,699 as a result of the sales of the product drastically increased by 30%, So this represents that the <u>product has an elastic demand.</u>

Learn more about elastic demand:

brainly.com/question/5078326

#SPJ1

3 0

1 year ago

Which of the following statements is FALSE?

soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer: The following statements is false: <u><em>Mutual aid and assistance arrangements and Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) cannot be used for supplementing incident staff.</em></u>

The above statement is wrong since mutual aid, assistance arrangements and memorandums of understanding can be used for supplementing incident staff.

<u><em>Therefore, the correct option is (c).</em></u>

8 0

3 years ago

Carr Corp. declared a 7% stock dividend on its common stock. The dividend:

oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer:

C) has no effect on Carr's earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes.

Explanation:

A stock dividend means that the corporation issues its existing shareholders more stock.

In essence, the corporation is merely diluting the proportional ownership interest of existing shares.

This has no effect on the corporation's earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes.

Therefore, the dividend has no effect on Carr's earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes.

4 0

2 years ago

Suppose that two Japanese companies, Hitachi and Toshiba, are the sole producers (i.e., duopolists) of a microprocessor chip use

Dima020 [189]

Answer: Please refer to Explanation

Explanation:

a) When both Hitachi and Toshiba engage in a limited campaign, they both earn $11 million.

If both engage in an extensive campaign they both earn $8 million.

However, if one firm engages in an extensive campaign and the other firm engages in a limited one, the firm engaging in a limited campaign earns $4 million while the one engaging in an extensive campaign earns $16 million.

I have attached a photo to show the payoff matrix as a table.

b) In the absence of a binding and enforceable agreement, that is to say that if both firms are not colluding, Hitachi's dominant strategy would be to engage in an EXTENSIVE PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGN.

A Firm's dominant strategy in absence of an agreement is that strategy that a firm can go on and make a maximum amount of profit regardless of what the other firm does.

Should Hitachi engage in an Extensive Campaign, they will make $16 million in quarterly profit if Toshiba engages in a Limited Campaign. Should Toshiba also decide to engage in an Extensive Campaign, then Hitachi makes a profit of $8 million. This is therefore their best alternative as opposed to embarking on a limited Campaign where there is a chance that they will make $4 million.

With the Extensive Campaign, Hitachi's Minimum Payoff is $8 million.

c) The game is the same for both players so the best option for Hitachi, is the best option for Toshiba as well. This means that Toshiba's dominant Strategy is an EXTENSIVE PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGN and their minimum payoff is $8 million as well.

3 0

2 years ago