Answer:
d. the linguistic relativity hypothesis
Explanation:
Linguistic relativity hypothesis -
According to this hypothesis , the language structure affects the view of the speakers and therefore the perceptions of the people are relative to the spoken language .
This is based on two versions , first the strong hypothesis and a weak hypothesis .
hence , from the information of the question , the correct answer is ( d ) . the linguistic relativity hypothesis .
Answer:<em> Option (A) is correct.</em>
<em>ENDA is the abbreviation of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act is known as legislation proposed in the US Congress which would further proscribe discrimination in hiring and employing based on an individual's sexual orientation or gender identity.</em>
<em>Therefore, a imminent legislation against inequity on the basis of sexual orientation is abbreviated as "ENDA"</em>
<em />
The loose monetary policy is the policy that the federal reserve use if the economy were entering into recession. In order for the federal reserve to fight the recession, they should support legislation which has higher taxes for wealth. They should also put into place very strong regulatory rules that banks and cooperation can't get across.
The three federal reserve tools which are used to undertake an easy monetary policy includes reserve requirement, discount rate, and open market operations. Federal reserve altered monetary policy in order to influence the amount of credit and money in U.S economy and the interest rates.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
<span>When analyzing the components that allow individuals to think in a more clear and effective manner, perhaps the foremost concept that explains this phenomenon is that synaptic pruning, as the brain and synapses work towards ensuring only the necessary things are thought about.</span>
