The shelves must be at least 15 centimeters or 6 inches above the floor.
Hopefully this helps :)
Answer:
Journalize the transactions is given below
Explanation:
given data
Issued = 66,500 shares
cash = $6 per share
Issued = 41,500 shares
cash = $8 per share
solution
we get here Journalize the transactions
and we assuming that the common stock has a par value of $6 per share
so
Jan. 10 cash is 66,500 × 6 = 399000
and cash for July 1 is = 41,500 × 8 = 332000
and common stock = 41,500 × 6 = 249000
paid in capital excess = 332000 - 249000 = 83000
Date Account Titles Debit Credit
Jan. 10 cash 399000
common stock 399000
July 1 cash 332000
common stock 249000
paid in capital excess 83000
When there is an increase in government spending, there will be an increase on the output, price level, and interest rates
<h3>What is a
government spending?</h3>
This refers to the funds injected to the public sector on the acquisition of services such as education, healthcare, social protection, defense etc.
Most time, the effect of an an increase in government spending leads to an increase on the output, price level, and interest rates as it is a method of stimulate demand.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about government spending
<em>brainly.com/question/25125137</em>
#SPJ1
Answer: The amount of bad debt expense the company would record would be $3,470.
Explanation: Bad debt expense is an estimate of accounts receivable that is deemed as uncollectible while allowance for doubtful accounts is a balance sheet allowance account that warehouses the total balance of accounts receivable that is deemed irrecoverable.
In this scenario, Simple Co. estimated, using the aging method, that the allowance for doubtful accounts is $3,800. However, it had a credit balance of $330 in the same account. The reinstate the allowance account to $3,800, $3,470 has to be adjusted for by debiting bad debt expense and crediting allowance for doubtful account.
Answer:
Explanation:
If I was Frank I wouldn’t have disclosed the information from one company to the next, it is unethical and with an NDA information shouldn’t be passed on. Even though, it may have been an opportunity for the company he got hired and a threat to the company he disclosed the information from.
