The answer is be because that's how it works in real life to most people
Answer:
The omnipotence fallacy
Explanation:
The omnipotence paradox or fallacy arise if one assumes that an omnipotent being has no limits and is capable of realizing any outcome or result and even logically contradictory ideas such as creating square circles. This family of fallacies hinges on the understanding of the word "omnipotent" which is the nature of God.
The most well-known version of the omnipotence paradox is the paradox of the stone "Could God create a stone so heavy that even He could not lift it? This phrasing of the omnipotence paradox is vulnerable to objections based on the physical nature of gravity, such as how the weight of an object depends on what the local gravitational field is. Other statements of the paradox that do not involve such difficulties include "If given the axioms of Euclidean geometry, can an omnipotent being create a triangle whose angles do not add up to 180 degrees?" and "Can God create a prison so secure that he cannot escape from it
Relating this to the question, smart think that they are all powerful and they can do whatever they want and will not come to any harm. This is a case of omnipotent fallacy. He feels all powerful.
And believes that because he exercises, smoking (which is dangerous to health) will not cause him any harm, and hence he shouldn't be in the statistics of smokers.
Answer:
New Amsterdam was a good location for a city because it was on an island which was at the mouth of the Hudson River, that flowed into the sea.
A sociological and communications framework for examining the long-term effects of media, particularly television, cultivation theory.
A sociological and communications framework for examining the long-term effects of media, particularly television, cultivation theory. It suggests that people who watch media a lot for a long time are more likely to see the world's social realities as they are shown in the media they watch, which has an effect on their attitudes and actions.
Development hypothesis was first made by teacher George Gerbner during the 1960s; In 1976, Gerbner and Larry Gross improved upon it. In 1973, Gerbner came up with his paradigm for mass communication, which consisted of three types of analysis: Institutional process analysis is the first type of analysis, and it examines the institutions that support and distribute the content in question. Message system analysis is the second kind of analysis. The purpose of message system analysis is to determine the content of message patterns in media and television. The cultivation analysis is the third type of analysis. It is defined as longitudinal surveys of people's opinions on particular subjects, with levels of media reception, like watching television, as the key variable. The Cultivation Theory is the name given to this analysis.
To know more about cultivation theory, visit:-
brainly.com/question/10582714
#SPJ4
The answer is media power theory. The aim of the theory segment is to indication how the method discussed above can be applied for a given set of representations. The power of a media organization is distinct as its capability to effect electoral the outcomes over and done with biased broadcasting. A influential media mogul is one that can encourage.
