Answer:
35 bricks for $25.90
35 bricks for $25.90
230 bricks for $170.2
Step-by-step explanation:
Cost per brick = number of bricks / price of bricks
1500/$1110 = $1.35
1300 / $845 = $1.54
230 / $170.20 = $1.35
100 / $75 = $1.33
35 / $25.90 = $1.35
Based on these calculations, the bricks that have the same cost per brick are :
35 bricks for $25.90
35 bricks for $25.90
230 bricks for $170.20
Answer:
The equation you are asking for is
40*(t+3) = 55*t,
where t is the time counted after the second car started.
The equation says that the distance covered by each car from the starting point to the catching point is the same for both cars.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
1)<u> Principal quantum number, n = 2</u>
- n is the principal quantum number and indicates the main energy level.
<u>2) Second quantum number, ℓ</u>
- The second quantum number, ℓ, is named, Azimuthal quantum number.
The possible values of ℓ are from 0 to n - 1.
Hence, since n = 2, there are two possible values for ℓ: 0, and 1.
This gives you two shapes for the orbitals: 0 corresponds to "s" orbitals, and 1 corresponds to "p" orbitals.
<u>3) Third quantum number, mℓ</u>
- The third quantum number, mℓ, is named magnetic quantum number.
The possible values for mℓ are from - ℓ to + ℓ.
Hence, the poosible values for mℓ when n = 2 are:
- for ℓ = 1, mℓ = -1, 0, or +1.
<u>4) Fourth quantum number, ms.</u>
- This is the spin number and it can be either +1/2 or -1/2.
Therfore the full set of possible states (different quantum number for a given atom) for n = 2 is:
- (2, 0, 0 +1/2)
- (2, 0, 0, -1/2)
- (2, 1, - 1, + 1/2)
- (2, 1, -1, -1/2)
- (2, 1, 0, +1/2)
- (2, 1, 0, -1/2)
- (2, 1, 1, +1/2)
- (2, 1, 1, -1/2)
That is a total of <u>8 different possible states</u>, which is the answer for the question.
Answer:
115% increase.
Step-by-step explanation:
129 - 60 = 69 / 60 = 1.15
1.15 x 100 = 115
Answer:
One possible confound for the experiment is the attitude of the research assistants.
Step-by-step explanation:
A confounder simply means a variable that has impact in influencing both the dependent variable and independent variable, causing a spurious association.
So, we can conclude that the attitudes of the research assistants have positive and negative impacts in determining the reactions of both participants in the experiment.
The rudeness of a research assistant will negatively impact the response of the participant allocated to him/her.
The calmness of the other research assistant will positively impact the response of the participant allocated to him/her.
